Haryana

StateCommission

CC/29/2016

NIRAJ KUMAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

PARSHVNATH DEVELOPERS LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

S.K.SUD

09 Jan 2017

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA.  

                                                 

                                                 Complaint No.             29 of 2016

                                                 Date of the Institution: 02.02.2016

                                                 Date of Decision:        09.01.2017

 

 

1.      Niraj Kumar son of Shri Dalip Chand,

 

2.      Smt. Naina Kapila wife of Shri Niraj Kumar,   

          Both residents of House No.11-D, Dayal Bagh Ambala Cantt. at present R/o Flat No.7, GH-25, Sector 20, Panchkula.

…..Complainants

VERSUS

 

1.      M/s Parsvnath Developers Limited, through its Managing Director, Registered & Corporate Office, 6^th Floor, Arunachal Building, 19, Barakhamba Road, New Delhi-110001.

 

2.      M/s Parsvnath Developers Limited, through Shri Yudhvir Arora, Senior Manager (CRM & Marketing), Site Office Parsvnath Royale, Sector 20, Panchkula.

 

3.      M/s S.B. Township (I) Ltd., Village Sheikhon on Pathankot Zira Talwandi Abhor Road, District Ferozpur, Punjab.

 

4.      M/s Alchemist Township (I) Ltd., Regd. Office : 411-12, Ansal Tower 38, Nehru Palace, New Delhi-110019.

 

5.      M/s REALPRO Assets Ltd., through its Managing Director, House No.3406, Sector 28-D, Chandigarh (In the original title of the Complaint Opposite Parties No.3 to 5 were arrayed as Opposite Party No.7 to 9).     

….. Opposite Parties

 

 

CORAM:    Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Mr. B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member.    

                  

                  

Present:-    Mr. S.K. Sud, counsel for the complainants.

                   Mr. Satpal Dhamija, proxy counsel for Mr. A.S. Khara, counsel for the opposite parties No.1 and 2.

                   Mr. Neeraj Malhotra, counsel for the opposite party No.4.

                   Mr. Ankur Bali, counsel for the opposite party No.5.

                  

                                                O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH J, (ORAL)

 

          Learned counsel for the complainants has made statement (Annexure-I) that this complaint be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh on the same cause of action. The statement is accepted. The complaint is dismissed as withdrawn accordingly.

 

 

Announced 09.01.2017

(Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member

(B.M. Bedi) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

  D.R.