K.Vijayakumar filed a consumer case on 07 Jun 2022 against Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd in the North Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/166/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 09 Jul 2022.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
CHENNAI (NORTH)
@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
PRESENT : THIRU. G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L., :PRESIDENT
TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E., : MEMBER-I
THIRU.V.RAMAMURTHY,B.A.,B.L.,PGDLA., :MEMBER-II
TUESDAY THE 07rd DAY OF JUNE 2022
C.C.NO.166/2018
K.Vijayakumar m/a 59 years
S/o. Karunakaran,
MIG #:316 VI Main,
Nolambur Mogappair West,
Chennai-37
…..Complainant
..Vs..
1.P.Balasubramanian
Director,
Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd.,
2. Special Officer,
Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd.,
No.73-74 Arcot Road,
Chennai-24
| .....Opposite Parties |
|
Counsel for Complainant : M/s.S.Natarajan
Counsel for opposite party : M/s.T.K.S. Gandhi & N.M.karthikeyan
ORDER
BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,
This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.
The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite party to repay Rs.63,600/- the amount due on FDR A/c.No.11316 with interest @ 12% from 01.06.00 till repayment and to repay Rs.68,320/- the amount due on FDR A/c.NO.6492 with interest @ 19% from 26.07.95 till repayment and to pay Rs.25,000/- for the deficiency of service committed by the opposite parties in failing to repay the money due with interest on the matured FDR and to pay Rs.50,000/- as compensation for the resultant mental agony and paid caused by such deficiency of service and to pay Rs.5,000/-as cost of this complaint.
Complainant and opposite party absent inspite of notice sent to them by RPAD. No representation on either side. W.P.No.42787/2004 and W.P.35512/2004 already disposed by Hon’ble High Court of Madras on 02.08.2007 following a scheme for payment to all the depositors by the Park Town Benefit Fund by appointing a special officer for repayment of deposit amount to depositors. The parties might have settled the matter as per scheme approved by company law board in C.P.No.91/2010. Hence no interest in prosecuting this complaint before this commission. No useful purpose will be served in keeping this matter pending. Hence this complaint is closed.
Order Pronounced dated 07th June 2022.
MEMBER – I MEMBER – II PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.