Orissa

Jagatsinghapur

CC/73/2021

Susanta Kumar Samal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Paradeep 4t owners Association - Opp.Party(s)

Mr.D.K.Nayak

19 Jul 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION JAGATSINGHPUR
JAGATSINGHPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/73/2021
( Date of Filing : 05 Apr 2021 )
 
1. Susanta Kumar Samal
S/o Nursingha charan Samal, At- Bijayachandpur, PO- Atharabanki, PS- Paradeep, Dist- Jagatsinghpur
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Paradeep 4t owners Association
S/o. Late Sunakar Sahoo, Office at Nimidihi, Plot No.30, Zero Point, P.O.- Paradeepgarh, P.S.- Paradeep Lock, Dist.- Jagatsinghpur
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Mr. N.C. Dash & Associates, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
Dated : 19 Jul 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                                                                    C.C. No.73/2021

 

Susanta Kumar Samal,

S/o. Nursingha charan Samal,

At.- Bijayachandpur,

P.O.- Atharabanki,

P.S.- Paradeep,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur,

Proprietor ESKAY SERVICES,

Regd. Transporter Having its

Regd. Office at Bijayachandpur,

P.O.- Atharabanki,

P.S.- Paradeep,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur.                                                ……………. Complainant

 

                                           (Versus)

 

Paradeep 4T Owners Association,

Represented through its Secretary,

Sri Bamadev Sahoo,

S/o. Late Sunakar Sahoo,

Office at Nimidihi,

Plot No.30, Zero Point,

P.O.- Paradeepgarh,

P.S.- Paradeep Lock,

Dist.- Jagatsinghpur. …..… Opposite party

 

For Complainant………..Mr. N.C. Dash & Associates

For Opposite Party………..Mr. S.K. Naik, Advocate

 

Date of Hearing: 27.6.2024                        Date of Judgment: 19.7.2024

ORDER BY HON’BLE PRESIDENT- MR. P.K. PADHI:

                                                                                            JUDGMENT

            Complainant has filed this consumer complaint U/s.35 of C.P. Act, 2019 seeking following reliefs;

            “Direct the opposite party to pay compensation of Rs.19,70,000/- towards for mental agony, expenditure, cost of litigation , loss of business/financial loss”.

            Brief fact of the case is that complainant being a member of Truck Owner Association being deprived of getting proper Cargo/loading/business has filed the consumer complaint but there is no document attached with the consumer complaint or filed any receipt regarding payment of consideration amount. 

            Relationship between complainant and opposite party is that of Association and Member and no consideration amount paid to get service. So complainant cannot be termed as a consumer as defined U/s.2(7) of Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Hence we find no merit in the consumer complaint and accordingly the consumer complaint is dismissed. No cost. 

            Pronounced in the open Commission on this 19th July,2024.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. PRAVAT KUMAR PADHI]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. MADHUSMITA SWAIN]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.