Haryana

Karnal

40ex/2014

Ranjeet Singh S/o Maya Ram - Complainant(s)

Versus

Pantel Technologies., Service Zone., Chirag Audio Recording center - Opp.Party(s)

Vishal Khundi

25 Nov 2014

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Execution Application No. 40ex/2014
In
Complaint Case No. 315/2013
 
1. Ranjeet Singh S/o Maya Ram
R/O 16-R Modal Town Karnal
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Pantel Technologies., Service Zone., Chirag Audio Recording center
E-33, Sec-63, Noida., Sco No.22, Mugal Cannal Karnal., Shop No.6, Modal Town Karnal
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Subhash Chander Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Execution No. 40 of 2014                                                                                                  Date of instt.24.11.2014

                                                          Date of decision: 26.02.2015

 

Ranjeet Singh S/o Maya Ram R/o 16-R, Modal Town, Karnal

                                                                 ………Decree holder

                                                Vs     

  1. Pantel Technologies, E-33, Sector 63, Noida 201301. Uttar Pardesh.
  2. Service Zone, SCO 22, Mugal Canal, Karnal through it’s Manager Mr. Devender Arora. (Authorised Pantel Service Center. )
  3. Chirag Audio Recording Centre, Shop No.6 Guru Teg Bahadur Public School Market, Modal Town, Karnal. Through its proprietor.

      ………JDs.

 

                   Complaint U/s 12 of the Consumer

                   Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.Subhash Goyal……. President.

                   Sh.Subhash Chander Sharma…………..Member.

 

 Present       Sh. Vishal Kundi, Advocate with Ranjeet Singh DH.

         Sh. Dheeraj Sachdeva  Advocate for the JD No. 1&2.

          Sh. Mohit Sachdeva, Advocate for JD No. 3.

 

ORDER:

                  

                   In view of the statement made by the Decree Holder, the present execution petition is dismissed as having been fully satisfied. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced:

26.02.2015.                                                                                                                                                     

                                                                             (Subhash Goyal)

                                                                               President,

(Subhash Chander Sharma )                  District Consumer Disputes  Member                                   Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Subhash Goyal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Subhash Chander Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.