IFB INDUSTRIES LTD. filed a consumer case on 29 Jul 2020 against PANKAJ SARDANA AND OTHERS in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is RP/48/2020 and the judgment uploaded on 25 Aug 2020.
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA, PANCHKULA
Revision Petition No. 48 of 2020
Date of Institution: 22.07.2020
Date of Decision: 29.07.2020
IFB Industries Limited, Plot No.640 A, Phase IX, Industrial Area, Mohali wrongly mentioned in complaint as IFB Manufacture/Authorized person/Manager 58 KM mile stone, Village Binola, Gurugram, Haryana, Pin 122413, India.
…..Petitioner
VERSUS
1. Pankaj Sardana, aged about 35 years, S/o Sh. Bishamber Das Sardana, R/o H. No.1050, Sector 20, HUDA, Sirsa, Tehsil and District Sirsa.
2. Authorized person/Manager/Incharge Flipkart Internet Private Limited, Vaishnavi Sumit, No.6/B, 7th Main, 80 feet road, 3rd Block, Koramgala, Bangalore-560034.
3. D.S. Service Center of IFB care, Dr. Amar Singh Sidhu wali gali, near Parshu Ram Chowk, Arya Samaj Road, Sirsa, District Sirsa through its authorized person/proprietor.
…..Respondents
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President.
Shri Harnam Singh Thakur, Judicial Member.
Present:- Shri Anshul Kukreja, counsel for the petitioner.
O R D E R
T.P.S. MANN, J.
At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to pursue with the present revision petition and it may be dismissed as withdrawn. Separate statement to this effect has also been recorded.
2. In view of the above, the revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Announced 29.07.2020 | (Harnam Singh Thakur) Judicial Member | (T.P.S. Mann) President |
D.R.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.