Ravi Ranjan filed a consumer case on 10 Jul 2023 against Pankaj Kumar, Prakhand Uddyan Padadhikari in the Jehanabad Consumer Court. The case no is CC/49/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 13 Jul 2023.
Complainant absent.
Attendance on behalf of the OP in person has been filed. It has been submitted by the OP that at the relevant time of the transaction alleged, he was posted as block horticulture officer, Jehanabad. Cost of the plants was received and credited in the account of the revolving fund not by him in persons, no transaction was at all was made by him in personal capacity as such making him OP with his name is illegal and the complaint filed before the court is incorrectly framed.
I fined froce in the submission of the OP hence the present complaint is dismissed being wrongly framed and filed before this commission. How ever, it is observed that since the transanction of money through deposite was madeon 08.03.2022 and two years has not elapsed since of the complainant from the date of the cause of action there for either complainant shall be liberty to filed a fresh complaint against the Block horticulture officer, Jehanabad but not against any one in his personal capacity.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.