Bihar

Jehanabad

CC/49/2022

Ravi Ranjan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Pankaj Kumar, Prakhand Uddyan Padadhikari - Opp.Party(s)

10 Jul 2023

ORDER

              Complainant absent.

                Attendance  on behalf of the OP in person has been filed. It has been submitted by the OP that at the relevant time of the transaction alleged, he was posted as  block horticulture officer, Jehanabad. Cost of the plants was received and credited in the account of the revolving fund not by him in persons, no transaction was at all was made by him in personal capacity as such making him OP with his name is illegal and the complaint filed before the court is incorrectly framed.

               I fined froce  in the submission of the OP hence the present complaint is  dismissed being wrongly framed and filed before this  commission. How ever, it is observed that since the transanction of money through deposite  was  madeon 08.03.2022 and two years  has not elapsed since of the  complainant from the  date of the cause of action there for either complainant shall be liberty to filed a fresh complaint against the Block horticulture officer, Jehanabad but not against any one in his personal capacity.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.