NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/282/2018

AUDI INDIA - Complainant(s)

Versus

PANKAJ ALMADI & 2 ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. PRAVEEN MAHAJAN

27 Apr 2018

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
FIRST APPEAL NO. 282 OF 2018
 
(Against the Order dated 15/12/2017 in Complaint No. 568/2017 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. AUDI INDIA
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE. OFFICE AT SILVER UTHOPIA, 4TH FLOOR, CARDINAL GRACIOUS ROAD, CHAKALA, ANDHERI (EAST).
MUMBAI-400099
...........Appellant(s)
Versus 
1. PANKAJ ALMADI & 2 ORS.
S/O. LATE SH. JAI PRAKASH. R/O. SCO. NO. 58, 3RD FLOOR, OLD JUDICIAL COMPLEX.
GURGAON.
HARYANA
2. M/S. AUDI GURGAON, CORPORATE OFFICE.
ZENICA CARS INDIA PVT. LTD. ORCHID CENTRE, 2ND FLOOR, GOLF COURSE LTD.
3. AUDI SERVICE GURGAON, CONCORE.
PLOT NO.288A, UDYOG VIHAR, PHASE-IV.
GURGAON.
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. JAIN,PRESIDENT

For the Appellant :
Ms. Ruchi Mahajan, Advocate
For the Respondent :
Ms. Geeta Malhotra, Advocate for R-1
Mr. Vaibhav Agnihotri, Mr. Rahul Malik
and Mr. Rudresh Jagdale, Advocates for
R-2 & 3

Dated : 27 Apr 2018
ORDER

At the outset, learned Counsel appearing for the Complainant submits that in order to avoid further delay in the final adjudication in

-2-

the Complaint, the Complainant would not object to the setting aside of the order impugned in the present Appeal, whereby the Appellant has been proceeded against ex parte and its right to file the Written Version has also been closed, provided the Complainant is adequately compensated for the delay already caused.

        In view of the afore-noted stand on behalf of the Complainant, and bearing in mind the observations made by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. And Anr. vs. M/s Mampee Timbers And Hardwares Pvt. Ltd. And Anr. (C.A. Diary No.2365 of 2017), the Appeal is allowed; the impugned order is set aside; the Appellant is permitted to file their Written Version within 30 days from today, with advance copy to the Counsel for the Complainant, and to Respondents No.2 and 3, and the Appellant shall be permitted to participate in the proceedings in the Complaint, subject to their paying to the Complainant a consolidated amount of ₹20,000/- as costs, which shall be paid before the State Commission.

        The Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms.

        Order dasti.

 

 
......................J
D.K. JAIN
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.