BEFORE THE A.P.STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION: AT HYDERABAD.

F.A.No. 1414 OF 2007 AGAINST C.C.NO.802 OF 2006 DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM-II HYDERABAD

Between
1.           

2.           

3.            

4.                    

Punjab & Sind Bank
rep. by its Branch Manager
Metro Estate, Abid Road
Hyderabad-001                         

Counsel for the Appellants                

Counsel for the Respondents

   QUORUM:     SRI SYED ABDULLAH, HON’BLE MEMBER

Oral Order (Per R.Lakshminarsimha Rao, Member)
              limitation.

        stththth 

        thth

       th

The opposite party resisted the claim contending that the complaint is not maintainable as the Bank is not made party. The branch manager is only a functionary of the Bank. ththth 

The sanctioning authority clarified that no interest is to be paid as 50%of the deposit amount was already paid and for the remaining 50%of the amount, the claimants have not been coming forward due to the dispute among themselves. The amount would be paid to them on submission of 1.Notarised claim form-218, 2.letter of indemnification from the bank where the claimant has his account, duly verifying his signature, and 3. Two passport size photographs of the claimant duly  

In its reply dated 25^th      A.Ramakoteshwer Rao, A.Lajpathrai, Bopanna Baby Sampurna Devi, G.Rajyalaxmi and K.Seshukumari in the ratio of 1/5^th 

1.    

2.    

3.    

       st  

       thththth  

KMK*