Haryana

Yamunanagar

CC/176/2013

Sumit Bansal S/o Sushil Bansal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Pandit Automobiles Pvt.Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

G.C.Verma

11 Aug 2017

ORDER

CC No. 176/13

Sumit Bansal vs. Pandit Automobiles Pvt. & ors.

 

Present:       Complainant in person represented by Sh. G.C. Verma, Advocate.

                   Sh. Rajiv Chawla, Advocate, counsel for the OP No. 1.

                   Sh. Vikas Aggarwal, Advocate, counsel for the OP No. 2.

 

                   Today the case was fixed for arguments. At this stage, complainant has appeared before the Forum and made separate statement in which he states that he wants to withdraw the present complaint with liberty to file a fresh on the same cause of action. He further requested that original documents may be returned and benefit of Limitation Act be given.

                   Heard. In view of the statement, the present complainant is hereby, dismissed with the liberty to file a fresh on the same cause of action. It would be open to the complainant to file an application before the District Forum under Section 14 of the Limitation Act for excluding the period spent before this Forum for the purpose of computation of Limitation in terms of the observations made by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Laxmi Engineering Works vs. PSG Industrial Institute (1995) 3 S.C.C. 583. Original documents be returned as per rules. A copy of the order be sent to the parties free of costs. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.  

Announced in open Court: 11-08-2017

                                                              ( DHARAMPAL)

                                                              PRESIDENT

                                                              D.C.D.R.F.YAMUNA NAGAR

                                                              AT JAGADHRI 08-08-2017

 

 

     (VEENA RANI SHEOKAND)          (S.C.SHARMA)

      MEMBER                                        MEMBER