Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/49/2015

S. Jayaraman - Complainant(s)

Versus

Palamuthir Nilayam - Opp.Party(s)

Party in Person

06 Nov 2015

ORDER

 

 

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,CHENNAI

 

BEFORE :  THIRU.J.JAYARAM                                   PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER

                  TMT.P.BAKIYAVATHI                               MEMBER                                      

                                                                                                

F.A.NO. 49/2015

 

(Against the order in CCSR.No.290/2014, dated 12.06.2014 on the file of DCDRF, Coimbatore)

 

DATED THIS THE 6^th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015

 

S.Jayaraman,

S/o.Shanmuga Nadar,

6/125, 3^rd Street, P.M.Sami Colony,                     Appellant / Complainant

R.S.Puram, Coimbatore 641 002.

                              Vs

 

1. Proprietor,

    Pazhamudir Super Market,

    Trichy Road, Ramanathapuram,                          Respondents / Opposite parties

    Coimbatore 641 045.

 

2.  V.V.Shanmuga Nadar & Sons,

     V.V.S. Gingille Manufacturer,

     96, Aruppukottai Road,

     Virudhunagar 626 001.

 

          This appeal coming before us for final hearing on 05.10.2015 and on hearing the arguments of the appellant and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the following order:

Appellant  / Complainant              :  S.Jayaraman, Inperson              

ORDER

J.JAYARAM,  PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER

          This appeal is filed by the complainant against the order of the District Forum, Coimbatore in CCSR.No.290/2014 dated 12.6.2014 rejecting the complaint with costs.

2.       Appellant’s arguments heard.  Records perused.

3.       It is pertinent to note that the District Forum has rejected the complaint on the sole ground that the name of the appellant / complainant has not been noted in the cash receipt to establish that he purchased the articles from the opposite party.

4.       The evidentiary value of the cash receipt can be decided in the enquiry of the complaint.  The complaint can be disposed of after due enquiry on merits.  The District Forum has erred in rejecting the complaint at the premature stage.

5.       In the result, the appeal is allowed, setting aside the order of the District Forum rejecting the complaint with costs, and the District Forum is directed to take the complaint on file, if it is otherwise in order.

 

 

P.BAKIYAVATHI                                                              J.JAYARAM

      MEMBER                                                                PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

INDEX : YES/ NO

VL/D;/PJM/consumer