Haryana

Charkhi Dadri

CC/40/2024

Baldev Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Palace Shoe Palace Kaliyana wale - Opp.Party(s)

13 Mar 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHARKHI DADRI. 

 

                                                                        Complaint No.         40 of 2024                                                                                                          Date of Institution:  07.03.2024

                                                                        Date of order:     :  13.03.2024

 

Baldev Singh son of Sh. Anoop Singh, R/o Rasiwas, Tehsil & District Charkhi Dadri

..Complainant.

                                                            VERSUS

Palace Shoes Palace Kaliyana Wale, Rohtak Chowk Se Loharu Road, Charkhi Dadri, Tehsil & District Charkhi Dadri, Haryana

                                                                                                            ..Opposite parties.

Present:           Complainant in person.

                                                                       

                        Complaint was presented by the complainant in person on 07.03.2024. The same was registered as CC No. 40/2024 and put up for consideration on the maintainability of the present complaint today on 13.03.2024.

                        Heard. The complainant mentioned that he had purchased “Gold Star” original shoes from the OP for Rs. 250/- on 16.02.2024. After 10-15 days after purchase the said shoes torned up. The complainant had mentioned that between 28.02.2024 to 01.03.2024, he visited the shop of OP with complaint of torning of the shoes. The OP replaced the shoes. However, the same again torned up as mentioned by the complainant. The complainant asked for the bill, but the OP offered bill for back date which complainant did not accept. Nevertheless, the complainant has not produced any bill for purchase of the said shoes.

                        It has been observed that the complainant has used letter head of a society viz. “JAN KALYAN WELFARE SOCIETY, VPO Rasiwas, District Charkhi Dadri.” But no resolution in regard to filing the present complaint on the letter head of the society was made available to the Commission. Further the complainant, viz. Baldev Singh had purchased shoes for his personal use which was found defective. He has failed to convence, this Commission about what harm caused to the society. We are of the view that an individual should not use the letter head of the society to fulfil his own interest.

                    The complainant has failed to place on record any cogent or authentic document/ bill for purchase of the shoes and gurantee card etc. in support of his complaint. The onus lies on the complainant to satisfy this Commission with evidences for issuing notice to the OP which is missing in the present complaint.

                        Hence, prima-facie, we opine that it is not a fit case for summoning of OP by issuing notice by this Commission. Therefore, the complaint of complainant being not maintainable in the present form, deserves dismissal. Hence, the same is hereby dismissed, with directions to the complainant to refrain himself from filing such unfounded complaints which may lead to imposing of penalty on the complainant for wasting precious time of this Commission.

                        Copy of the order be supplied to complainant free of cost. File be consigned to the record-room.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.