Mr. N. Kathiravan, S/o Mr. S. Nagalingam, Rep by his Father and Power AgentMr. S. Nagalingam, Manali, Chennai-600 068 filed a consumer case on 28 Jun 2023 against Pacifica ( Chennai Project), Rep by its Director, InfrastructureCo Pvt Ltd, Ramdev Nagar, Ahmedabad- in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is CC/199/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 24 Aug 2023.
IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.
BEFORE Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL MEMBER
C.C. No.199/2018
DATED THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE 2023
1. S. Kathiravan, (Deceased),
S/o. S. Nagalingam,
2. Tmt. K. Lalitha,
W/o. Late Kathiravan,
3. K. Adhithi Sarvadha,
D/o. Late Kathiravan
4. K. Neel Aayush,
S/o. Late Kahiravan,
Complainants 3 & 4 are represented by their
Mother and Natural Guardian,
Tmt. K. Lalitha, the 2nd complainant,
5. Tmt. N. Anjalatchi,
W/o. Mr. Nagalingam,
Complainants 2 to 5 are residing at:
New No.11, Old No.14, Vimalapuram,
3rd Street, Manali,
Chennai – 600 068.
Complainants 2 & 5 are represented by their Power Agent,
Mr. Nagalingam,
Residing at:
New No.11, Old No.14, Vimalapuram,
3rd Street, Manali,
Chennai – 600 068. .. Complainants.
(2 to 5 complainants are impleaded as per the
Order dt.15.09.2022 in MP No.116/2022)
- Versus –
1. Pacifica (Chennai Project),
Represented by its Director,
Infrastructure Company Pvt. Ltd.,
No.33, Amarpalsh Bungalows,
Behind Fun Republic,
Ramdev Nagar,
Ahmedabad – 380 015.
2. Pacifica Companies Aurum,
Represented by its Director,
Nr. SRR Engineering College,
Rajiv Gandhi Salai (OMR),
Padur,
Chennai – 603 103.
3. The Assistant General Manager,
State Bank of India,
Retail Assets Central Processing Centre (RACPC),
Anna Nagar,
Chennai – 600 102.
4. The Branch Manager,
State Bank of India,
Rountana- Anna Nagar Branch,
AA7, IInd Avenue Near Rountana,
Anna Nagar,
Chennai – 600 040. .. Opposite parties.
Counsel for the complainants 2 to 5 : M/s. R. Dhamodaran
Counsel for the opposite parties 3 & 4 : M/s. S. Senthil Kumar
Opposite parties 1 & 2 : Exparte
This consumer complaint coming up before us on 28.06.2023 for appearance of both parties, for filing written arguments of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:
Docket Order
Complainant present. No representation for the opposite parties 3 & 4.
When the matter is taken up for consideration, the Counsel for the complainant has filed a Memo in which, it has been stated that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties out of Commission and thus seeking permission to withdraw this Consumer Complaint.
Recording the Memo, the complainant is permitted to withdraw this Consumer Complaint.
Accordingly, this Consumer Complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
Sd/- Sd/-
R.VENKATESAPERUMAL R.SUBBIAH
MEMBER PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.