Kerala

StateCommission

A/10/417

THE DISTRICT OFFICER ,IDEA CELLULAR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS - Complainant(s)

Versus

P.SANKARAN KUTTY - Opp.Party(s)

PRABHU VIJAYAKUMAR

20 Sep 2010

ORDER

First Appeal No. A/10/417
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/03/2010 in Case No. cc224/2009 of District Trissur)
1. THE DISTRICT OFFICER ,IDEA CELLULAR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONSCASINO COMPLEX,T.B ROADTHRISSURKERALA2. ISSAC THOMASNODAL OFFICERIDEA CELLULAR LTDERNAKULAMKERALA3. IDEA MOBILE COMMUNICATIONSMATHURA ROADNEW DELHIDELHI ...........Appellant(s)

Versus
1. P.SANKARAN KUTTYPORAKKAT HOUSE,THALORETRISSURKERALA ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE :
HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
PRESENT :

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL 

     COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

            APPEAL NO:417/2010

 

                              JUDGMENT DATED:20-09-2010

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU                :  PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                    : MEMBER

 

1.         District Officer,

IDEA Mobile Communictions Limited,

Casino Compled, TB Road, Thrissur.

 

2.         Issac Thomas,

Nodal Officer, IDEA Cellular Limited,                : APPELLANTS

Mercy Estate, Ravipuram, M.G.Road,

Kochi.

 

3.         IDEA Mobile Communications Limited,

IDEA Cellular Limited,

A—30, Mohan Co-operative Estate,

Mathura Road, New Delhi.

 

(By Adv:Sri.Prabhu Vijayakumar)

 

            Vs.

P.Sankarankutty, Porakkat House,

Thalore. P.O, Thrissur District.                           : RESPONDENT

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

 

The appellants are the opposite parties in CC.224/09 in the file of CDRF, Thrissur.  The matter relates to the complaint filed alleging deficiency of service that the talk time of one month was not provided as offered and also as the battery of the mobile phone has become defective.  The opposite parties/appellants had disputed the maintainability on the basis of the decision of the Supreme Court in General Manager, Telecom Vs. M.Krishnan and Another, (2009 (8)SCC 481).

2. We find that the Forum has rightly held that with respect to the matter involved the decision of the Supreme Court is not applicable.  Opposite parties/appellants are private operators.  In the circumstances we find that there is no scope for admitting the appeal.  The appeal is dismissed in-limine.

Office will forward copy of this order to the Forum.

 

 

JUSTICE K.R.UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR  : MEMBER

 

 

 

VL.

 

PRONOUNCED :
Dated : 20 September 2010

[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]PRESIDENT