Punjab

Tarn Taran

CC/58/2020

Sukhraj Kaur - Complainant(s)

Versus

P.S.P.C.L - Opp.Party(s)

G.S. Sandhu

18 Mar 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,ROOM NO. 208
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX TARN TARAN
 
Complaint Case No. CC/58/2020
( Date of Filing : 21 Sep 2020 )
 
1. Sukhraj Kaur
w/o jartaj Singh R/o Baba Deep Singh Colony, Goindwal bypass Tarn Taran.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. P.S.P.C.L
1. Punjab State Power corporation Limited, through its Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub Division, Tarn Taran, Tehsil & Distt. Tarn Taran.
2. P.S.P.C.L
2. PSPCL through Sr. XEN sub urban Division Tarn taran,
3. P.S.P.C.L
3. Through its chairman
4. P.S.P.C.L
4. Parambir Singh s/o Lakhwinder singh
5. Karanbir Singh
5. Karanbir Singh s/o lakhwinder Singh Bot R/o Muradpur Near Local Gurudwara, Tarn Taran Tehsil & Distt. Tarn Taran
6. Jaswant Singh
6. Jaswant singh S/o Nand Singh R/o Dashmesh colony, Amritsar road, opposite OLD SSP office Tarn Taran
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Sh.Charanjit Singh PRESIDENT
  Sh.Jatinder Singh Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:G.S. Sandhu, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
For OPs Nos. 1 to 3 Sh. K.M. Gupta Advocate
For OP No. 6 Sh. Guriqbal Singh Advocate
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 18 Mar 2021
Final Order / Judgement

 

From the perusal of written statement and documents placed on record it is clear that the present case pertains to unauthorize use of electricity. Alongwith the written version, the opposite parties have placed on record Self attested copy of Inspection Report Ex.OP-R6 addressed to the complainant which it is reproduced as follows:-

“That the above said person is residing in Baba Deep Singh Colony situated near Goindwal Chownk. In this colony, S. Jaswant Singh Padda has taken temporary connection No. 3005326969 for development of Colony. The colonizer is giving the electricity to the residents of colony by installing Sub Meter.…….”

In addition to that the opposite parties have also placed on record one document Ex. OP-R7 addressed to the complainant i.e. Notice of Provisional order of assessment for unauthorized use of electricity in exercise of power under provision of Reg. 36 of Supply code-2014 & Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003. The opposite parties have also placed on record another document i.e. final order of Assessment for unauthorized Use of electricity as per provisions of Regulation-36 of Supply Code 2014 & Section 126 of Electricity Act 2003, which is Ex. OP-R8. All the above said documents shows that this case relates to unauthorized use of electricity. Therefore, in view of Judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court titled as “U.P. Power corporation Vs Anis Ahmed” vide C.A. No.  5466 of 2012 (arising out of SLP(C) No. 35906 of 2011), this Commission is not competent to entertain this complaint. Hence, the present complaint is dismissed. The parties are left to bear their own costs. Copy of order be supplied to the parties as per rules. File be consigned to record room.

Announced in Open Commission.

18.3.2021

 
 
[ Sh.Charanjit Singh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sh.Jatinder Singh Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.