Punjab

Tarn Taran

CC/6/2021

Lakhbir Kaur - Complainant(s)

Versus

P.S.P.C.L - Opp.Party(s)

B.S.Bedi

26 Aug 2021

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,ROOM NO. 208
DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX TARN TARAN
 
Complaint Case No. CC/6/2021
( Date of Filing : 19 Feb 2021 )
 
1. Lakhbir Kaur
Lakhbir Kaur aged 49 years W/o Jaswant Singh s/o Khushal Singh R/o village Malluwal Santa,at present R/o Baba Deep Singh Colony , Goindwal Bypass, Tarn Taran, Tehsil & District Tarn Taran
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. P.S.P.C.L
Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. through Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Urban Division, Focal Point, Tarn Taran, Tehsil and District Tarn Taran
2. P.S.P.C.L
Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd., Patiala through its Chairman.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Sh.Charanjit Singh PRESIDENT
  Sh.Jatinder Singh Pannu MEMBER
 
PRESENT:B.S.Bedi , Advocate for the Complainant 1
 
For the O.PS Sh. Rakesh Raman Arora Advocate
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 26 Aug 2021
Final Order / Judgement

For the O.PS                  Sh. Rakesh Raman Arora Advocate

In the written version filed by the opposite party, it is pleaded that the complaint is not maintainable, as the same is filed by the complainant in connivance with the owners of alleged colony, who are hand in glove with each other, as they all are misusing the power and had openly committed the power theft when the officials of PSPCL has visited a surprise visit on 23.7.2020 and the complainant flew away from the spot. Thereafter, also the answering opposite parties visited number of times but the complainant runs away from his premises.  The opposite party has placed on record affidavit of Aman Kumar SDO Punjab State Power Corporation Limited Sub Urban Sub Division, Tarn Taran in support of its allegations in the written statement.  The version taken by the opposite party in its written statement shows that this case relates to unauthorized use of electricity/theft of electricity. Therefore, in view of Judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court titled as “U.P. Power corporation Vs Anis Ahmed” vide C.A. No.  5466 of 2012 (arising out of SLP(C) No. 35906 of 2011), this Commission is not competent to entertain this complaint. Hence, the present complaint is dismissed. The parties are left to bear their own costs. Copy of order be supplied to the parties as per rules. File be consigned to record room.

Announced in Open Commission.

26.8.2021

 
 
[ Sh.Charanjit Singh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sh.Jatinder Singh Pannu]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.