ASHOK KR. RAI filed a consumer case on 08 Feb 2018 against P.N.B. in the East Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/104/2013 and the judgment uploaded on 01 Mar 2018.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (EAST)
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
CONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR,
SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092
C.C. NO. 104/13
Shri Ashok Kumar Rai
S/o Shri Raj Balam Rai
R/o House No. 32
Molad Band Gaon, Delhi ….Complainant
Vs.
Through it’s A.R. /Manger
Branch Office at E-Block
DDA Market, Mayur Vihar
Phase-II, Delhi
Through it’s A.R. /Manger
Personnel Administration Division
H.O.- 7, Bhikaji Cama Place
New Delhi …Opponents
Date of Institution: 11.02.2013
Judgement Reserved on : 08.02.2018
Judgement Passed on: 08.02.2018
CORUM:
Sh. Sukhdev Singh (President)
Dr. P.N. Tiwari (Member)
Ms. Harpreet Kaur Charya (Member)
Order By: Sh. Sukhdev Singh (President)
JUDGEMENT
This complaint has been filed by Shri Ashok Kumar Rai against Punjab National Bank (OP), under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 with allegations of deficiency in service.
2. The facts in brief are that the complainant Shri Ashok Kumar Rai was having saving account and ATM Card vide no. 5126 5201 1144 8614 of Punjab National Bank (PNB). When he has gone through the bank statement of 04.01.2013, he came to know that a deduction of Rs. 10,000/- as withdrawn from his account was shown. He made complaint of this illegal deduction of Rs. 10,000/- to police station as well as various authorities, but nothing happened. Thus, he has stated that this illegal deduction amounts to deficiency in service for which he has suffered mental pain and suffering. Thus, he has stated to be entitled for damages of Rs. 20,000/- in addition to Rs. 10,000/- deducted alongwith Rs. 20,000/- on account of litigation.
3. In the WS, filed on behalf of PNB, they have denied the allegations and have stated that complainant had withdrawn Rs. 10,000/- on 20.12.2012 as per their record and the said transaction was successful as per log/ATM account inclusive of JP log. Thus, they have denied their liability.
4. In support of its complaint, complainant have examined himself. He has deposed on affidavit. He has narrated the facts which have been stated in the complaint. He has got exhibited documents such as copy of ATM Card (Ex.CW-1/1), copy of account statement (Ex.CW-1/2) and copy of complaint to police station dated 04.01.2013 (Ex.CW-1/3).
In defence, OP have examined Shri Rajiv Ranjan, power of attorney holder of PNB, who have also deposed on affidavit. He has also narrated the facts which have been stated in the Written Statements. He has also got exhibited documents such as copy of J.P. log / ATM account (Ex.RW-1/1 and 1/2).
5. We have heard Ld. Counsel for the complainant and have perused the material placed on record as the counsel for OP did not appear to argue. Though, complainant have stated that he has not received an amount of Rs. 10,000/- when he made the transaction, but evidence on record brought in the testimony of Shri Rajiv Ranjan such as reconciliation sheet / J.P. log (Ex.RW1/1 and 1/2) show that the amount of Rs. 10,000/- was withdrawn.
In the presence of this evidence and in the absence of any evidence on contrary produced by the complainant, it cannot be said that the complainant have not withdrawn an amount of Rs. 10,000/-. That being so, the allegations put by the complainant against Punjab National Bank, cannot be accepted. Therefore, there cannot be said to be any deficiency on the part of Punjab National bank.
When there was no deficiency on the part of OP, no case of the complainant has been made out. Therefore, his complaint deserves its dismissal and the same is dismissed. There is no order as to cost.
Copy of the order be supplied to the parties as per rules.
File be consigned to Record Room.
(DR. P.N. TIWARI) (HARPREET KAUR CHARYA)
Member Member
(SUKHDEV SINGH)
President
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.