Chandigarh

DF-II

CP/48/2012

Tashi Norbu Bodh - Complainant(s)

Versus

P.H. Houses Pvt. Ltd, - Opp.Party(s)

16 Aug 2012

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 48 of 2012
1. Tashi Norbu BodhR/o # 1937, sector 22/B, chd. ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. P.H. Houses Pvt. Ltd,through its Director Sh. Amarjeet Singh Randhawa, SCO 362, (Second Floor), Sector 44/D, Chandigarh. ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 16 Aug 2012
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM–II, U.T. CHANDIGARH

 

Criminal Complaint No.48 of 2012

in

Consumer Complaint No.294 of 2010

 

 

Toshi Norbo Bodh           Vs.               P.H.Houses Pvt. Ltd.

 

PRESENT:

 

Complainant in person with his counsel Sh.V.P.Chatrath, Advocate.

Sh.T.T.P.Singh, Counsel for OP.

 

Dated the 16th day of August, 2012

 

ORDER

 

           

            Counsel for OP has made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“I offer a demand draft No.001216, dated 23.7.2012 for a sum of Rs.25,17,812/- drawn in favour of Toshi Norbo Bodh on HDFC Bank, in total compliance of the order dated 27.5.2011 passed by this Forum”

 

            The complainant, alongwith his counsel, made the following statement, recorded separately:-

“I have received demand draft No.001216, dated 23.7.2012 for a sum of Rs.25,17,812/- drawn in my favour on HDFC Bank, in total compliance of the order dated 27.5.2011 passed by this Forum. Now the order dated 27.5.2011 has been duly complied with. So, I do not press this criminal complaint. It be dismissed being fully satisfied”

 

            In view of the statement made by the complainant alongwith his counsel, this criminal complaint is dismissed being fully satisfied.

            Certified copy of this order be communicated to the parties free of cost. After compliance file be consigned.

                        Sd/-                              Sd/-                                          Sd/-

(JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU)       (LAKSHMAN SHARMA)           (MADHU MUTNEJA)

MEMBER                                  PRESIDENT                                MEMBER



MRS. MADHU MUTNEJA, MEMBERHONABLE MR. LAKSHMAN SHARMA, PRESIDENT MR. JASWINDER SINGH SIDHU, MEMBER