NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/621/2010

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

P.C. MATHEW - Opp.Party(s)

MR. M.T. GEORGE

08 Mar 2010

ORDER

Date of Filing: 02 Feb 2010

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/621/2010
(Against the Order dated 10/02/2009 in Appeal No. 900/2004 of the State Commission Kerala)
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.Perumbanachi P.O., ChanganacherryKottayamKerala State2. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDElectrical Major Section,ChanganacherryKottayam, Kerala State3. THE SECRETARY, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARDVaiduthy Bhavan,Pattom, ThiruvanhapuramKerala State ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. P.C. MATHEWProprietor, Gem Rubber Industries,Mamood P.O., Changanacherrty, Kottayam,Kerala State ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN ,PRESIDENTHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Appellant :Ms. Smitha Rani, Advocate for MR. M.T. GEORGE, Advocate Ms. Smitha Rani, Advocate for MR. M.T. GEORGE, Advocate
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 08 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

          This Revision Petition has been filed with a delay of 214 days, which is over and above the period of 90 days statutorily given to file the Revision Petition.  Under the Consumer Protection Act, the consumer fora are required to decide the case within a period of 90 days from the date of filing, in case, no evidence is required to be taken and within 150 days, wherever evidence is required to be taken.  Delay of 214 days cannot be condoned without sufficient cause being shown.  As per averments made in the application for condonation of delay, delay has been caused due to administrative reasons; that the file was moving from table to table. 

We are not satisfied with the cause shown.  Application for condonation of delay is dismissed.   Consequently, the Revision Petition is dismissed as barred by time.

 



......................JASHOK BHANPRESIDENT
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER