E.Govindaraju S/o.E.Venkatakrishnaiah filed a consumer case on 07 Jun 2022 against P.Balasubramanian in the North Chennai Consumer Court. The case no is CC/131/2018 and the judgment uploaded on 09 Jul 2022.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
CHENNAI (NORTH)
@ 2ND Floor, T.N.P.S.C. Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai – 600 003.
PRESENT : THIRU. G. VINOBHA, M.A., B.L., :PRESIDENT
TMT. KAVITHA KANNAN, M.E., : MEMBER-I
THIRU.V.RAMAMURTHY,B.A.,B.L.,PGDLA., :MEMBER-II
TUESDAY THE 07rd DAY OF JUNE 2022
C.C.NO.131/2018
1. E.Govindarajulu, 68 yrs,
S/o.Sri.E.Venkatakrishnaiah,
2. E.Rajamma, 63 years,
W/o.E.Govindarajulu,
1 & 2 at no.6 (Old No.9/B) 2nd st.
Ganesh Nagar,
Near GKshetty Junior college,
Adambakkam, Chennai-88.
…..Complainants
..Vs..
P.Balasubramanian
Director,
Park Town Benefit Fund Ltd.,
No.8, Mahalakshmi street,
T.Nagar, Chennai-17.
| .....Opposite Party
|
|
Counsel for Complainant : Party-In-Person
Counsel for opposite party : M/s.T.K.S. Gandhi & N.M.karthikeyan
ORDER
BY PRESIDENT THIRU. G.VINOBHA, M.A.,B.L.,
This complaint is filed by the complainant u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.1986.
The complainant filed this complaint against the opposite party to repay Rs.8500/- due on FD bearing A/c.No.140201 with interest @ 11% from Nov 2002 till repayment and to repay Rs.28,000/- due on FD bearing A/c.No.28370 with interest @ 12% from its date of maturity 12-05-2002 till repayment and to pay Rs.10,000/- for the deficiency of service committed by the opposite party in failing to repay the money due with interest on deposits on maturity and to pay Rs.10,000/- as compensation for the resultant mental agony and pain caused by such deficiency of service and to pay Rs.5,000/- as costs of this complaint.
Complainant and opposite party absent inspite of notice sent to them. No representation on either side. W.P.No.42787/2004 and W.P.35512/2004 already disposed by Hon’ble High Court of Madras on 02.08.2007 following a scheme for payment to all the depositors by the Park Town Benefit Fund by appointing a special officer for repayment of deposit amount to depositors. The parties might have settled the matter as per scheme approved by company law board in C.P.No.91/2010. Hence has no interest in prosecuting the complaint before this commission. No useful purpose will be served in keeping this complaint pending. Hence this complaint is closed.
Order Pronounced dated 07th June 2022.
MEMBER I MEMBER II PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.