Delhi

StateCommission

FA/402/2014

LIC OF INDIA - Complainant(s)

Versus

P. VAITHIA LINGAM - Opp.Party(s)

16 May 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. FA/402/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/02/2014 in Case No. CC/695/2012 of District New Delhi)
 
1. LIC OF INDIA
MANAGER (Legal & H.P.F.), DIVISIONAL OFFICE, 25, KASTURBA GANDHI MARG, NEW DELHI.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. P. VAITHIA LINGAM
R/O C-619, J.J. COLONY, KHAYALA, NEW DELHI-110018.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

 

IN THE STATE COMMISSION :DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

                         Date of Decision: 16.05.2014

                                    

First Appeal – 402/2014

 

 

Life Insurance Corporation of India,

Through its duly constituted attorney,

Manager (Legal & H.P.F.),

Divisional Office,1

25, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,

New Delhi.

…….Appellant

 

vs

 

P. Vaithia Lingam,

R/o C-619, J.J. Colony,

Khayala,

New Delhi-110018.

…….Respondent

 

 

CORAM

 

Salma Noor, Presiding Member

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

SALMA NOOR, PRESIDING MEMBER

 

1.     In a complaint case bearing No.695/2012 P. Vaithia Lingam vs  L.I.C. of India filed before District Forum-VI, M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi-110002, 7.02.2014 was fixed for appearance of the OP when the OP did not appear and the Forum ordered to proceed ex-parte against the OP. 

 

2.   That is what brings the Appellant/OP in appeal before    this Commission for setting aside the said ex-parte order. 

 

3.   We have heard Shri Abhishek Nanda, Counsel for the Appellant in this appeal at the admission stage as there is no need to hear the respondent.

 

4.   The version of the appellant/OP for his non appearance on 7.02.2014 is due to negligence of its Advocate on the date fixed. There is no plausible reason to disbelieve or not to rely and act upon this version of the appellant.  Besides this, it has always been the consistent policy of the courts to   allow a little latitude, so that the parties may contest the case on merits, and an effective order may be passed.  Order dated 7.02.2014 passed by the District Forum against the appellant/OP is set aside with the direction to the District Forum that they will allow the appellant/OP to file the WS and evidence and decide the case after hearing both the parties.  The appellant is directed to appear, through his counsel, before the District Forum-VI, M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi-110002 in this case on the date fixed before the Forum.

 

5.   Copy of this order be sent to District Forum-VI, M-Block, Vikas Bhawan, New Delhi-110002 for information and to keep it on record and compliance.

 

    

                          

 
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.