Telangana

StateCommission

A/218/2015

M/s. Suchiar India Infratech Pvt Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

P. Suresh Chandra - Opp.Party(s)

M/s Gopi Rajesh and Associates

30 Nov 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
First Appeal No. A/218/2015
(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/05/2014 in Case No. CC/582/2012 of District Hyderabad-II)
 
1. M/s. Suchiar India Infratech Pvt Ltd.,
Rep by its MD Sri Kiran Kumar, Regd Office at 50 B, Journalists Colony Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. P. Suresh Chandra
S/o Sri Radhakrishna, aged about 42 years, Occ. Private Service R/o 6236 nw 35 Terrace, Gainesville, FL,32653, USA, Rep by His SPA Holder Sri Radhakrishna,S/o Buchi Rao, aged about 75 years, R/o Flat No 2B, IInd Floor Paturi Enclave,1-4-880/2/33, Gandhinagar, Hyderabad 500080
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION :

AT HYDERABAD

 

FA NO. 218 OF 2015 against CC NO.582/2012

on the file of DCF-II, Hyderabad

 

Between :

 

M/s Suchir India Infratech Pvt., Ltd.,

Rep. by its M.D. Sri Y.Kiran Kumar,

Regd. Office at 50B, Journalists Colony,

Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

Appellant/Opposite party

And

P.Suresh Chandra S/o Sri Radhakrishna,

Aged about 42 years, Occ: Private Service,

R/o 6236 NW 35 Terrace,

Gaines Ville, FL-32653, USA.

Rep. by his SPA holder Sri Radhakrishna

S/o Buchi Rao, aged about 75 years,

R/o Flat No.2B, II Floor, Paturi Enclave,

1-4-880/2/33, Gandhinagar,

Hyderabad – 500 080.

Respondent/Complainant

 

Counsel for the Appellant                             :        M/s Gopi Rajesh & Associates

Counsel for the Respondent               :        

 

Coram                  :

 

Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla  …      President

 

Monday, the Thirtieth day of November

Two thousand Fifteen

 

Oral Order : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla, Hon’ble President)

 

***

 

          This is an appeal filed against the orders dated 16.05.2014 passed in CC No.582/2012 by the District Consumer Forum-II, Hyderabad seeking to set aside the same.

 

2.       Counsel for the Appellant present and reported that the matter is settled out of court between the parties and to that effect filed a memo and accordingly prayed to close the appeal.

 

3.       Heard.  Perused the memo.

 

4.       In the circumstances stated in the memo, the above appeal is dismissed as settled out of court. 

 

PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.