Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/20/2014

MARUTHI SHELTERS INDIA PVT. LTD., MANAGING DIRECTOR - Complainant(s)

Versus

P. SAVARIMUTHU - Opp.Party(s)

C.D. FRANCIS

30 Aug 2022

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                        PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. S. KARUPPIAH                                             JUDICIAL MEMBER

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                          MEMBER

 

F.A. No.20/2014

 

(Against the Order dt.09.01.2013 made in C.C. No.83/2012 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Coimbatore)

DATED THE 30^TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022

 

 

1. M/s. Maruthi Shelters India (P) Ltd.,

Represented by its Managing Director

Mr. M.D. Kumaran,

No.36, Engineer Compound Pricol Colony,

Kavundampalayam,

Coimbatore – 30.

 

2. Mr. M. Kumaran,

S/o. Mr. Murugaiah Chettiar,

Managing Director,

M/s. Maruthi Shelters India (P) Ltd.,

No.36, Engineer Compound Pricol Colony,

Kavundampalayam,

Coimbatore – 30.                                                           .. Appellants / Opposite parties.

-Versus-

 

1. Mr. P. Savarimuthu,

S/o. Mr. Paulraj,

No.94, Bhavani Main Road,

Pallapalayam,

Perundurai Taluk,

Erode.

 

2. Mr. S. Edwin Prabhu,

S/o. Mr. P. Savarimuthu,

No.94, Bhavani Main Road,

Pallapalayam,

Perundurai Taluk,

Erode.                                                            .. Respondents 1 & 2 / Complainants 1 & 2.

 

3. The Branch Manager,

State Bank of Travancore,

R.S. Puram Branch,

Functioning at:

D. No.160, D.B Road,

R.S. Puram,

Coimbatore.                                                    .. 3^rd Respondent / 3^rd Opposite party.

 

Counsel for Appellants / Opposite parties                    : M/s. C.D. Francis

Counsel for Respondents 1 & 2 / Complainants 1 & 2 : M/s. Bent Law Firm

3^rd Respondent / 3^rd Opposite party                             : Appeal dismissed as against the 

                                                                                       3^rd Respondent / 3^rd opposite party

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 30.08.2022 for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                                

 

Docket Order

 

No representation for both parties.   There was no representation for the appellant continuously for the past three hearings.

This appeal is posted today for appearance of both parties and for arguments (in list) or for dismissal. 

When the matter was called at 10.30 A.M., the appellant was not present.   Hence, passed over and called again at 01.00 P.M. still, there was no representation for the appellant.  Hence, we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence, this appeal is dismissed for default.    No order as to costs.

 

                       Sd/-                                          Sd/-                                            Sd/-

R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                S. KARUPPIAH                               R.SUBBIAH

            MEMBER                             JUDICIAL MEMBER                           PRESIDENT