Telangana

StateCommission

A/697/2014

M/s. Suchir India Infratech Pvt.Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

P. Ramesh Chandra Phani, S/o. Sri Radha Krishna - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. Gopi & Rajesh Associates

17 Nov 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
First Appeal No. A/697/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/09/2014 in Case No. CC/569/2012 of District Hyderabad-III)
 
1. M/s. Suchir India Infratech Pvt.Ltd.,
Rep.by its MD.Sri Y.Kiran Kumar, Regd. Office at 50B, Jounalists Colony, Jubilee hills, Hyderabad.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. P. Ramesh Chandra Phani, S/o. Sri Radha Krishna
R/o. Flat 2B, II Floor, Paturi Enclave, 1-4-880/2/33, Gandhi Nagar, Hyderabad.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION :

AT HYDERABAD

 

FA NO. 697 OF 2014 against CC 569/2012

on the file of DCF-III, Hyderabad

 

Between :

 

M/s Suchir India Infratech Pvt., Ltd.,

Rep. by its M.D. Sri Y.Kiran Kumar,

Regd. Office at 50B, Journalists Colony,

Jubilee Hills, Hyderabad.

Appellant/Opposite party

And

P.Ramesh Chandra Phani

S/o Sri Radha Krishna,

Aged about 40 years,

R/o Flat 2B, II Floor,

Paturi Enclave,

1-4-880/2/33, Gandhi Nagar,

Hyderabad.

Respondent/Complainant

 

Counsel for the Appellant                             :        M/s Gopi Rajesh & Associates

Counsel for the Respondent               :        

 

Coram                  :

 

Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla  …      President

 

Tuesday, the Seventeenth day of November

Two thousand Fifteen

 

Oral Order : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla, Hon’ble President)

 

***

 

 

          This is an appeal filed against the orders dated 26.09.2014 passed in CC No.569/2012 by the District Consumer Forum-III, Hyderabad seeking to set aside the same.

 

2.       Counsel for the Appellant present and reported that the matter is settled out of court in full and final satisfaction as per the Memorandum of Understanding entered into between the parties and to that effect filed a memo.

 

3.       Heard.  Perused the memo.

 

4.       In the circumstances stated in the memo, the above appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 

 

PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.