NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2913/2011

THE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

P. R. CHINNASWAY - Opp.Party(s)

SHAILESH MADIYAL

31 Oct 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 2913 OF 2011
 
(Against the Order dated 26/10/2010 in Appeal No. 1094/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)
1. THE COMMISSIONER, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD & ANR.
Housing Board, Cauvery Bhavan, K.G Road
Bangalore - 09
Karnataka
2. The Secretary,
Karnataka Housing Board Curvey Bhawan,K.G Road
Bangalore- 09
Karnataka
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. P. R. CHINNASWAY
R/o 290,KHB Colony Kengeri Upanagar, 3rd Block
Bangalore - 560 060
Karnataka
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHAN, PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. VINEETA RAI, MEMBER

For the Petitioner :SHAILESH MADIYAL
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 31 Oct 2011
ORDER

This revision petition has been filed with a delay of 213 days, which is over and above the statutory period of 90 days given for filing the revision petitioner.  Consumer fora are required to decide the cases in a summary manner within given time frame.  Complaint has to be disposed of within 90 days from the date of filing where no evidence is required to be taken and within 150 days where evidence is required to be taken.  The inordinate delay of 213 days cannot be condoned without sufficient cause being shown.  The only cause shown for the delay is that the petitioner received the copy of the order on 02.11.2010.  On 25.02.2011, petitioner requested its counsel in Delhi to prepare the revision petition.  After going through the papers, counsel for the petitioner vide his letter dated 09.03.2011 asked the petitioner to send some clarifications and documents which were necessary for filing the revision petition.  That in the process of locating the various documents sought and sending the same to the counsel for the petitioner, the delay of 213 days in filing the revision petition occurred. 

The delay of each day has to be explained which the petitioner has failed to do.  We are not satisfied with the cause shown for condonation of delay.  Application seeking condonation of delay is dismissed.  Consequently, revision petition is dismissed as barred by time.

Question of law is left open.

 
......................J
ASHOK BHAN
PRESIDENT
......................
VINEETA RAI
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.