Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/352/2017

M/s. Chennai Ford - Complainant(s)

Versus

P. Murugesan, Director, Pioneer Aero Travels Pvt. Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. M. Swaminathan

12 Sep 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                  BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                      Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 352/2017

(Against the order in C.C. No.157/2015, dated 11.9.2017, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Chennai(North)

 

                                                             DATED THIS THE 12TH  DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022

 

M/s Chennai Ford,

(Dealer – Ford India Private Limited)

Rep.by its Managing Director,

No.423, Poonamallee High Road,

Arumbakkam, Chennai 600 106                       ..Appellant/3rd opposite party

 

                                                 Vs

 1.P.Murugesan,

Director,

Pioneer Aero Travels (M) Pvt.Ltd,

G-10, Eldorado Buildings,

Nungambakkam,

Chennai – 600 034                                           ..1st Respondent /complainant

 

2. The Manager, (Customer Care),

M/s Ford India Private Limited,

3rd Floor, Building 10c, DLF cyber city,

DLF phase II, Gurgaon – 122 002                     .. 2nd Respondent /1st opposite party

 

3. M/s Ford India Private Limited,

Regional office – South,

Rep.by its Director,

Block-18, 1st Floor,

RMZ Millennia Business Park,

143, Dr. MGR Road, North Veeranam Salai,

Perungudi, Chennai 600 096                              ..3rd Respondent/2nd opposite party

 

4. HDFC Bank Limited,

Rep.by its Branch Manager,

Ceebros Building No.110,

Nelson Manickam Road,

Chennai 600 029                                             ..4th Respondent/4th opposite party

 

Counsel for the Appellant                            : M/s M.Swaminathan

Counsel for the 1st Respondent /complainant : M/s K.Ganesan

Counsel for the 2nd and 3rd Respdts              : M/s R.Senthilkumar

Counsel for the 4th Respondent/4th op           : M/s Pass Associates

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

 

                                                     Docket order

 

   Both present. Today when the matter is taken up for hearing a joint memo of compromise has been filed signed by both the parties stating that the matter has been settled between the parties. The appellant and 1st respondent stated in the joint memo of compromise, that he has no objection to withdraw the mandatory deposit of Rs.25,000/- to the appellant.

          In view of the compromise memo, this appeal is disposed off.

          Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit of Rs.25,000/- along with accrued interest to the appellant/3rd opposite party.

     Joint memo of compromise shall form part of the order.

                 Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                      R.SUBBIAH                  

      MEMBER                                                                                           PRESIDENT

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.