Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/283/2015

The Regional Manager, Fujitsu General Ltd., - Complainant(s)

Versus

P. Meena Mohan & anr. - Opp.Party(s)

K. Jayaraman,

23 Nov 2021

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                           BEFORE   HON’BLE THIRU. JUSTICE. R. SUBBIAH                  ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                              Tmt.Dr.S.M.LATHA MAHESWARI                                 ::      MEMBER

 

FA. No. 283/2015

  (Against the order in C.C. No. 84/2013, dated 8.12.2014 on the file of the DCDRC, Chengalpattu )

                                                               DATED THIS THE 18^th  DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

 

The Regional Manager,

Fujitsu General Ltd,

ETA STA House,

No.71/63, 3^rd Floor,

Sterling Road, Nungambakkam  

Chennai – 34                                      ..Appellants/1^st opposite party

 

                                              Vs

           

Tmt.P.Meena Mohan,

W/o Mohan,

No.4, Elango street,

Vedachalam Nagar,

Kanchipuram,

Kanchipuram District                                ..1^st Respondent/complainant

 

2. M/s S.R.Cool,,

Rep.by its Partner,

Mr.S.Nagarajan Sha & Mr.S.Narayanan Sha,

Dealers of Air conditioning  and

Refrigeration products,

No.538-B, 539 Gandhi Road,

Kanchipuram                                           ..2^nd Respondent/2^nd opposite party

 

Counsel for Appellant                            : M/s K.Jayaraman

Counsel for 1^st Respondent/complainant  : M/s R.Ragunathan

 

This consumer complaint coming up before us on 23.11.2021 for appearance of both and for filing written arguments of appellant and R1 and for arguments(list) and this Commission made the following order in open court :                                         

Docket order

           

                         No representation for Appellant. R1 present. When this matter was called at 11.00 A.M, there is no representation for the Appellant. Hence the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon, but the Appellant was again not present. Hence the appeal is dismissed for default.

               Sd/-                                                                                             Sd/-

  S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                           R. SUBBIAH

               MEMBER                                                                                PRESIDENT