Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/438/2013

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, THE BRANCH MANAGER - Complainant(s)

Versus

P. KALIYAPERUMAL - Opp.Party(s)

SUNANDA SUREN

27 Apr 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
First Appeal No. FA/438/2013
( Date of Filing : 17 Dec 2013 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )
 
1. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, THE BRANCH MANAGER
PACKKAMKOTTUR BRANCH, NAGAPATTINAM
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. P. KALIYAPERUMAL
MELATHERU, THENKARAI, VADAKARAI VILLAGE, NAGAPATINAM TALUK AND DISTRICT
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Apr 2022
Final Order / Judgement

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                               BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                    Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 438/2013

(Against the order in C.C. No.18/2013, dated 19.11.2013, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Nagapattinam )

DATED THIS THE 27th  DAY OF APRIL 2022

 

1.The Branch Manager (Public Information Officer)

Indian Overseas Bank,

Packkamkottur Branch,

Nagapattinam,

 

2. The Central Public Information Officer,

Indian Overseas Bank

Regional office,

Nagapattinam                                        ..Appellants/opposite parties

                                           Vs

P.Kaliyaperumal

S/o Mr.Pitchai,

Melatheru

Thenkarai, vadakarai village, 

Nagapattinam Taluk and District                 ..Respondent/ complainant

 

For the Appellants/opposite parties                  : Party in person

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant          : M/s V.Babu

 

          This appeal coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

                                                Docket order

          No representation for both. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for reporting compliance of Rs.500/- each to the Registrar, SCDRC and for filing written arguments of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present. Hence, passed over and called again at 12.45 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

      Sd/-                                                                                                      Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                                PRESIDENT

 

 

       

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBBIAH]
PRESIDENT
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.