Orissa

Baleshwar

CC/33/2020

Sri Bijay Krushna Dey, aged about 53 years - Complainant(s)

Versus

Owner-Cum-Proprietor of SATYA'S MOBILE, Balasore - Opp.Party(s)

Sri Hrudananda Barik

13 May 2024

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASORE
AT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001
 
Complaint Case No. CC/33/2020
( Date of Filing : 22 Oct 2020 )
 
1. Sri Bijay Krushna Dey, aged about 53 years
S/o. Late Ratan Kishore Dey, At- Manikhamb, P.O- Motiganj, P.S- Town, Dist- Balasore.
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Owner-Cum-Proprietor of SATYA'S MOBILE, Balasore
Fandi Bazar, Balasore-756001.
Odisha
2. M.D of Flextronics Technologies India Private Limited, Uthukaddu Kattavakkam
Survey No. 90, Door No. 7, Plot No. ASV Mind Space, Space Road, State High Way-120, Uthukaddu Kattavakkam, Wallayabad Kancheepuram Taluk, Dist- Kancheepuram-631605.
Tamil Nadu
3. Owner-Cum-Proprietor of Xiaomi Service Center, Balasore
ASC Code No. XMINI779S, Pradhan Electronics, Asis Plaza, O.T Road, Balasore-756001.
Odisha
4. Owner-Cum-XMINI205 Service Center, Balasore
Kacheri Road, Balasore- QDIGI, S.S Infotech, Kacheri Road (1), Near Church, Balasore-756001.
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 13 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                                         The case is posted today for filing of fresh step against O.P No.3 by the complainant as last chance. Advocate for the complainant is absent, no steps filed. O.Ps No.1, 2 & 4 are absent, no steps filed. On repeated calls, none respond on behalf of the complainant. Hence, hearing of the case could not be taken up. Perused the case record.

                                         In the present case, as the notices against O.Ps No.1, 2 & 4 were sufficient and they have neither appeared nor filed w/v till yet, hence the O.Ps No.1, 2 & 4 are set ex-parte. Further, as the complainant has not filed fresh step against O.P No.3 after several directions, hence the case against O.P No.3 is dismissed. As it appears from the case record that the complainant remained absent since 14.03.23 to till today, for which hearing of the case impaired and the valuable time of this Commission is being wasted. Considering the nature & conduct of the complainant, this Commission is of the view that the complaint of the complainant should be dismissed.   

                                         Accordingly, the complaint of the complainant is dismissed for non-prosecution of the case.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. NILAKANTHA PANDA]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JIBAN KRUSHNA BEHERA]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.