Maharashtra

Chandrapur

CC/22/212

Smt.Ranjana Dinakar Tekam - Complainant(s)

Versus

Ossian Real Ested Through Syam Balkrushna Ingade - Opp.Party(s)

Nandkishor Potdukhe

26 Jul 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION
CHANDRAPUR
 
Complaint Case No. CC/22/212
( Date of Filing : 18 Jul 2022 )
 
1. Smt.Ranjana Dinakar Tekam
Quq.no.26/A, Type-1,sector-4,ordnance factory,Bhadravati,T.Bhadravati,Dist.Chandrapur
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Ossian Real Ested Through Syam Balkrushna Ingade
Dr.Indu Agrawal hospital samor,Kumbhar mohalla,bajar ward,Chandrapur
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
2. Shyam Balkrushna Ingade Through Ossian Real Ested
Dr.Indu Agrawal hospital samor,Kumbhar mohalla,bajar ward,Chandrapur
CHANDRAPUR
MAHARASHTRA
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Atul D.Alsi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Kirti Vaidya Gadgil MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Kalpana Jangade Kute MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 26 Jul 2022
Final Order / Judgement

(Passed on 26/07/2022)

Passed by Shri Atul D. Alsi, Hon’ble President 

1.         Counsel for the complainant  submitted that  the complainant  entered  into  an agreement  to purchase  a plot  at Mouza Khutala   Survey No. 125/4  lay out plot No.  14 having admeasuring 228 sq. mtrs. for consideration of Rs. 12,27,000/-  and agreement  to sell   on 09/11/2021 and agreement  is extended on 08/04/2022 for  further  period.  The counsel for the complainant  submitted that  the non execution of  sale deed as per  misleading advertisement  by the O.P., thus amount to  negligence of service  and  there is consumerable  interest  and case shall be admitted.

2.         The agreement executed  between the  parties  is in  respect of  open plot without  promise  to execute the  services.  The counsel for the complainant filed judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 2328-2383 of 2022 between Bharati Bhattacharjee Vs. Quazi Md. Maksuduzzaman and Ors.  holding that  the non execution  of sale deed in respect of  flat thus amount  to negligence   of service. Here in this case the complainant filed petition /complaint for non execution of sale deed of plot and not a flat. There are no services under taken by the O.P. to be performed as per agreement to sale. There is no consumerable interest between complainant and O.P. Therefore, the District Commission has no jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.  Hence, the complaint is dismissed at the stage of admission.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Atul D.Alsi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Kirti Vaidya Gadgil]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Kalpana Jangade Kute]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.