Oriental Insurance & one another V/S Sri. R. Manohar - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CPA/93/136

Sri. R. Manohar - Complainant(s)

Versus

Oriental Insurance & one another - Opp.Party(s)

22 Jul 1997

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
consumer case(CC) No. CPA/93/136

Sri. R. Manohar						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Oriental Insurance & one another						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

This order is pronounced in the open court on seperate sheets of paper today. The question is whether complainant's further claim attract section 2(1) (d) (I) and (II) of the Consumer Protection Act? If so, whether his claim has been finally settled by the respondent? No complainant has no remedy. The relationship between the complainant (the receipient of service) and the respondent (Providing of service) came to an end when his claim by consent in the way of executing a discharge voucher was finally settled discharging of all liabilities under the policy by the insurer. It is evident that the action of the complainant in approaching this Forumk with his complaint is a after though in order to bolster a further claim against the respondent. Therefore we dismi9ss the petition with direction to pay the court cost of Rs.250/- to the opposite party by the complainant.

This order is pronounced in the open court on seperate sheets of paper today.<br /> The question is whether complainant's further claim attract section 2(1) (d) (I) and (II) of the Consumer Protection Act? If so, whether his claim has been finally settled by the respondent?<br /> No complainant has no remedy.<br /> The relationship between the complainant (the receipient of service) and the respondent (Providing of service) came to an end when his claim by consent in the way of executing a discharge voucher was finally settled discharging of all liabilities under the policy by the insurer. It is evident that the action of the complainant in approaching this Forumk with his complaint is a after though in order to bolster a further claim against the respondent.<br /> Therefore we dismi9ss the petition with direction to pay the court cost of Rs.250/- to the opposite party by the complainant.