Punjab

Mansa

CC/21/61

Amar Nath - Complainant(s)

Versus

oriental Insurance Company Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Sh Satish Kumar Singla

09 Dec 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
MANSA
PUNJAB
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/61
( Date of Filing : 20 Apr 2021 )
 
1. Amar Nath
son of Madan lal S/on Sohan Lal r/o Jawaharke road, Jain Colony, House No. 26, Mansa Tehsil Mansa
Mansa
Punjab
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. oriental Insurance Company Ltd
Shri Ram building, new court road, Mansa Tehsil Mansa through its Branch Manager
Mansa
Punjab
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  R.L.MITTAL PRESIDENT
  Sharda Attri MEMBER
  Suraj Goyal MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Sh Satish Kumar Singla, Advocate for the Complainant 1
 Sh Pardeep Kumar Singla, Advocate for the Opp. Party 1
Dated : 09 Dec 2022
Final Order / Judgement
09.12.2022
Present: Sh. S. K. Singla, Advocate counsel for complainant.
Sh. P. K. Singla, Advocate counsel for opposite party.
1. Brief Facts : The Complainant has been buying health insurance from the OP annually since 2015 with a policy cycle commencing from 15th of October of every year to the 14th of October of succeeding year. Complainant submitted that due to some illness, he, firstly from 21.01.2020 to 25.01.2020 and then secondly from 09.11.2020 to 14.11.2020, was hospitalized in DMC Ludhiana, wherein he incurred Rs. 35,660/- and Rs. 46,082/- upon his first and second treatment respectively. Complainant submitted that for both of these treatment expenditures, he filed insurance claims to the OP and sought reimbursement but the OP till date has not completely settled the ibid claims and aggrieved with that the complainant has preferred the present complaint praying that OP be directed to pay the insurance claim amount of Rs. 35,692/- i.e. amount pending under both of the ibid claims alongwith interest @18% p.a. and Rs. 20,000/- as compensation and Rs. 25,000/- as Litigation expenses.
2. In reply, interalia to various other objections, the OP mainly has asserted that the 1st claim of the complainant was for Rs. 35,660/- out of which after deducting the TDS & other non payable expenses, Rs. 23,648/- was approved and duly paid on 11.02.2020 vide NEFT/Cheque No. 2119526924 and the 2nd claim of the complainant was for Rs. 46,081/- out of which after deducting the TDS & other non payable expenses, Rs. 30,708/- was approved and duly paid on 09.12.2020 vide NEFT/Cheque No.
12094555320. First and Second claim settlement vouchers are Ex. OP-3 and Ex. OP-4 respectively. So, claiming no deficiency in service the OP has prayed for dismissal of the present complaint.                                      (1)
3. Complainant has tendered into evidence his Self-Declaration and documents Ex.C-1 to C-39 and closed the evidence. OP tendered into evidence the Self-Declaration of Mr. Ashwani Kumar, Senior Divisional Manager and some documents Ex. OP-1 to Ex. OP-6 and closed the evidence. Written Arguments submitted by the parties are also on the record.
4. We have heard the learned counsels of the parties and gone through the oral & documentary evidence placed on record, with their kind assistance.
5. Claim settlement vouchers i.e. Ex. OP-3 and Ex. OP-4 are the clear and undisputed evidence of the fact that the amounts spent by the complainant upon his first and second treatment have been duly reimbursed by the OP as per the policy terms and conditions. There was no cause of action against the OP, therefore the OP is not guilty of any deficiency in service on his part.
6. Resultantly, in view of the above, the present complaint is dismissed and parties are left to bear their own costs.
7. Applications pending, if any, stand disposed of in terms of the aforesaid judgement. 
8. The complaint could not be decided within the statutory limits, due to Covid restrictions, unavailability of quorum and pendency of other cases.
9. Copy of the order be sent to the parties concerned free of cost and file be consigned to the record room. 
Pronounced:
09.12.2022
                                                                                 Sharda Attri, R. L. Mittal,
                                                                                     Member President
 
With utmost respect I am unable to concur with the findings/decision of the case.
 
                                                                                                         Suraj Goyal
(2)                                                                                                           Member
 
 
[ R.L.MITTAL]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Sharda Attri]
MEMBER
 
 
[ Suraj Goyal]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.