Maharashtra

StateCommission

A/00/1740

Shri. Vilas Narayan Dahiphule - Complainant(s)

Versus

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Shri. Dattatray B. Wadkar

01 Aug 2011

ORDER

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAI
 
First Appeal No. A/00/1740
(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/07/2000 in Case No. 110/98 of District Raigarh)
 
1. Shri. Vilas Narayan Dahiphule
788, Malati Mahal, 3rd Road, Khar, Mumbai
Mumbai
Maharashtra
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
Panvel Branch, Shivram Sadan, Shivaji Road, Panvel
Raigad
Maharashtra
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar PRESIDING MEMBER
 Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale Member
 Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar Member
 
PRESENT:
None present for both the parties.
......for the Appellant
 
ORDER

Per Shri P.N. Kashalkar – Hon’ble Presiding Judicial Member:

 

 

     None is present for the Appellant as well as for the Respondent.

 

     The Consumer Complaint No.110/1998 filed by the original Complainant has been dismissed on 27.07.2000 by the Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, District Raigad.  The said complaint was heard by the President and two Members.  As per the certified copy of the judgement filed along with the Appeal by the Appellant (Complainant himself) judgement is signed by the President - Shri M.B. Khedkar and Shri S.R. Joglekar, Member but another Member Smt.V.V. Bhandari, who heard the complaint had not signed the judgement.  Under section 14 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, the judgment of the District Forum is required to be signed by the President and Members sitting with the President who heard the matter.  As is clear from the certified copy of the judgement, on 22.07.2000 President was Shri Khedkar and along with him two members were sitting on the Bench, one was Shri S.R. Joglekar and another was Smt.V.V. Bhandari.  However, the jdugement which is placed on record is signed by the President and one Member Shri Joglekar only and second member Smt.V.V. Bhandari had not put her signature on the jdugement.  This legal infirmity prompts us to allow this appeal and send this matter back to District Forum for fresh disposal in accordance with the law.    Hence, we pass the following order:

 

O  R  D  E  R

 

              (i)     Appeal is allowed.

 

            (ii)     The judgement of dismissal of complaint dated 27/07/2000 passed by the District Forum is quashed and set aside and complaint is remitted back to District Forum, Raigad for fresh disposal in accordance with the law in the light of the observations made above by us.

 

          (iii)     After receipt of the order from this Commission, the District Forum shall issue notice to both the parties and then after hearing both the parties decide the complaint afresh.

 

         (iv)     No order as to costs.

 

           (v)     Inform the parties accordingly.

 

 

Pronounced on 1st August, 2011.

 

 
 
[Hon'ble Mr. P.N. Kashalkar]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[Hon'ble Mrs. S.P.Lale]
Member
 
[Hon'ble Mr. Dhanraj Khamatkar]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.