Delhi

StateCommission

A/971/2014

GAJENDER SINGH TYAGI - Complainant(s)

Versus

ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

31 Oct 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/971/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/214/2014 of District North East)
 
1. GAJENDER SINGH TYAGI
D-4, KIRAN GARDEN UTTAM NAGAR NEW DELHI-110059.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.
88 GROUND FLOOR JANPATH NEW DELHI-110001.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION

(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 

Date of Decision: 31.10.2014

 

First Appeal No. – 971/2014

 

Gajender Singh Tyagi

D-4, Kiran Garden

Uttam Nagar

New Delhi-110059.  

                                                                                   …….Appellant

 

Versus

 

Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.

DO- 29

88 Ground Floor

Janpath

New Delhi-110001.                                                        .….Respondent

 

CORAM

Justice Veena Birbal, President

Salma Noor, Member

N P Kaushik, Member (Judicial)

 

Salma Noor, Member

 

1.         This is an appeal filed against the order of the District Forum North East-IV Nand Nagri, New Delhi dated 05.09.2014 in complaint case no. 214/2014 by which the complaint of the complainant was dismissed in complainant’s default.

2.          We have heard Sh. Rajesh Kumar, counsel for the appellant in this appeal and perused the record.

3.           The version of the complainant for his non appearance before the District Forum on the date fixed is that his counsel failed to appear before the District Forum due to sudden illness and complaint of the complainant was dismissed in default. To support of his contention the appellant has filed his own affidavit. We do not find any plausible reason to disagree with the appellant’s version. Under the circumstances, we allow the appeal and setting aside the dismissal order dated 05.09.2014 in question and remand the case back to District Forum North East-IV Nand Nagri, New Delhi with a direction to restore the complaint to its original number, and to further proceed in the case with accordance of law, issuing notice to the opposite party. The appellant/complainant is directed to appear before the District Forum on 17.12.2014.

5)            Copy of this order be sent to District Forum North East-IV Nand Nagri, New Delhi for information and to keep it on record and compliance. File be consigned to record room.

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.