Order No.1 contd…        24/8/2022

In view of order no. 08 passed in CC Case/197/2021 dated 24/08/2022, the  application dated 02/02/2022 filed by the complainant praying for  amendment of the complaint application is registered as MA/103/2022.

Copy served.

Written objection filed by the opposite party.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant as well as Ld. Advocate for the opposite party are present.

The application dated 02/02/2022 filed by the complainant is taken up for hearing along with its objection.

Heard both sides.

Ld. Advocate for the opposite party submits that the application itself is misconceived and cannot be allowed as no schedule of proposed amendment is given in the application. Moreover, the language of the proposed amendment is not clear and full of ambiguity.

Ld. Advocate for the complainant himself admits that the language of the proposed amendment is not clear.

It is apparent on the face of the application that the language of the proposed amendment is not clear and if it is allowed it would only create ambiguity. Moreover, it has not been mentioned clearly as to where in the original complaint application, the proposed amendment will be placed.

Therefore, the Misc. application dated 02/02/2022 praying for amendment of complaint application stands rejected on contest but without cost.

Thus the MA is disposed of.