Delhi

South Delhi

CC/74/2015

PARITOSH KAPIL - Complainant(s)

Versus

ORIENTAL BANK LTD - Opp.Party(s)

05 Dec 2018

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23
QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016
 
Complaint Case No. CC/74/2015
( Date of Filing : 17 Mar 2015 )
 
1. PARITOSH KAPIL
1031 NEAR DURGA ASHRAM CHHATTARPUR NEW DELHI
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. ORIENTAL BANK LTD
SAKET CULTURAL CLUB OPP ANUPAM CINEMA SAKET NEW DELHI
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. R S BAGRI PRESIDENT
  KIRAN KAUSHAL MEMBER
  NAINA BAKSHI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
NONE
 
For the Opp. Party:
NONE
 
Dated : 05 Dec 2018
Final Order / Judgement

                                                        DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II

Udyog Sadan, C-22 & 23, Qutub Institutional Area

(Behind Qutub Hotel), New Delhi-110016.

 

Case No.74/2015

 

Sh. Paritosh Kapil

R/o 1031, Near Durga Ashram

Chhattarpur, New Delhi                                                 ….Complainant

 

Versus

Oriental Bank of Commerce

Saket Cultural Club

Opp Anupam Cinema, Saket

New Delhi                                                                 …...Opposite Party

                                       

Date of Institution               :    16.03.2015

              Date of Order        :    05.12.2018

Coram:

Sh. R.S. Bagri, President

Ms. Naina Bakshi, Member

Ms. Kiran Kaushal, Member

 

Naina Bakshi, Member

ORDER

 

 

Complainant’s case, in brief, is that complainant opened, as zero balance account bearing No.12032191021781 on 15.02.2013 with the OP at Prem Nagar, Ambala City Branch and no amount  was deposited at the time of opening account due to banking policy, that any person can open an account with zero balance. On 13.03.14 complainant  had transferred his bank account from Ambala City to Saket New Delhi and deposited Rs.1500/-. Complainant got the print of the passbook, which shows balance of Rs.1045/- on 15.03.14. On 02.03.15 the complainant again deposited Rs.4,000/- and balance was Rs.4552/-,  after so many deductions shows in the passbook, that minimum balance charges were deducted from his account. Complainant  personally consulted the Manager of OP who had informed him that it was statutory deductions as the minimum balance was less than Rs.1000/- but on 15.03.14 in his account the balance was available Rs.1045/- despite repeated requests made orally by the complainant, the OP had not given any proper reply. Hence, pleading deficiency in service on the part of the OP the complaint has been filed with the following prayers:

  1. Direct the OP to pay Rs.50,000/- to the complainant from the date of filing of the complaint. 
  2. Direct the OP to pay Rs. 40,000/-  being claimed as compensation for harassment and  mental agony.
  3. Direct the OP to pay Rs.10,000/- as litigation charges to the complainant.

OP has been proceeded exparte vide order dated  02.09.2015.

Complainant has filed his own affidavit and also written arguments.

We have heard the complainant in person and have also gone through the file very carefully.

The complainant filed a cash deposit receipt dated 13.03.14 (Ex. CW-1/A) wherein he has deposited Rs.1500/- with the OP bank. The Ex. CW-1/B shows that on 22.03.14 there was balance of Rs.1075/- in his account and on 02.03.15 the balance was Rs.4552/.

The averments made in the complaint and evidence led by the complainant have remained controverted and unchallenged. Hence, there is no reason to disbelieve version of the complainant.  The OP has the knowledge of filing the complaint by the complainant as the notice was duly served upon the OP.

It is clear from the record that the complainant’s account was transferred from Ambala City to Delhi, Saket Branch.  From the perusal of Ex. CW1/B it shows that there was balance B/F Rs. Zero and cash deposit was Rs.1500/- on 13.03.14. On 22.03.14 various transactions were shown and the balance was Rs.997/- and again transactions was shown and on 02.03.15 the amount was Rs.552/-. The complainant deposited cash Rs.4000/- on 02.03.15 and balance was Rs.4552/-.  It is evident from the passbook that the balance was carry forward from Rs. Zero from Amala to Delhi Branch. It is clear that the OP had opened the account as zero balance and deductions made by the OP on various dates amounts to unfair trade practice on the part of the OP.

Keeping in view the above facts discussed hereinabove, we allow this complaint and direct the OP to pay sum of Rs.5000/- in lumpsum to the complainant including cost of litigation within 30 days of receipt of copy this order, failing which the OP shall become liable to pay interest @ 6% p.a. on the amount of Rs.5000/- from the date of filing of complaint till realization.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the parties as per regulation 21 of the Consumer Protection Regulations.  Thereafter file be consigned to record room.

 

Announced on 05.12.2018

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. R S BAGRI]
PRESIDENT
 
[ KIRAN KAUSHAL]
MEMBER
 
[ NAINA BAKSHI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.