West Bengal

Rajarhat

CC/201/2019

Smt. Anima Das W/o Sri Santanu Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

Oom Construction - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. Satyajit Saha

17 Mar 2022

ORDER

Additional Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Rajarhat (New Town )
Kreta Suraksha Bhavan,Rajarhat(New Town),2nd Floor
Premises No. 38-0775, Plot No. AA-IID-31-3, New Town,P.S.-Eco Park,Kolkata - 700161
 
Complaint Case No. CC/201/2019
( Date of Filing : 23 Dec 2019 )
 
1. Smt. Anima Das W/o Sri Santanu Das
118, Bandhab Nagar Colony, P.O & P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Oom Construction
Bandhab Nagar Colony, P.O & P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
2. Sri Shyamal Kumar Mallick S/o Late Kalipada Mallick
92/A, Bandhab Nagar Colony, P.O & P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
3. Sri Suman Barua S/o Late Ashim Barua
112/1, Bandhab Nagar Colony, P.O & P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
4. Smt Sumita Adhikary W/o Sri Sadhan Adhikary
119/B,Bandhab Nagar Colony, P.O & P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
5. Sri Manik Saha S/o Late Nemai Saha
192,R.N. Guha Road, P.O & P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
6. Smt Maya Das W/o Late Krishaapada Das
72 Bandhab Nagar Colony, P.O & P.S Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
7. Smt Papiya Das W/o Sri Somnath Das
Garui Panchanatala, P.O- Rabindra Nagar, P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
8. Smt Nisha Koley W/o Sri Sandip Koley
72, Bandhab Nagar Colony, P.O & P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
9. Subrata Halder S/o Late Naresh Chandra Halder
124/1, Bandhab Nagar Clony, P.O & P.S- Dum Dum, Kolkata-700028.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 17 Mar 2022
Final Order / Judgement
  1. The OPs are the developers in respect to 2 cottas 9 chittacks 23 square feet of land appertaining to plot no. 1540 and 1541 within Mouja Digla under P.S Dumdum where a multi storied building was proposed to be constructed.
  2. The Complainant who was in search of residential accommodation came to know about the proposed housing project of the OPs on 19.12.2018 and made an agreement with the developers on 14.02.2019 for purchasing a flat measuring about 610 square feet in the first floor of the proposed building at Rs. 11,00,000/- and accordingly made payment of Rs, 4,10,000/- Rs. 10,000/- was paid in cash and Rs.  4,00,000/- was paid by cheque being no. 782025 dated 14.02.2019 drawn on IDBI Bank. It was settled in between them that the flat would be handed over by 28th February 2019 after accepting the balance amount of Rs. 6,00,000/-. But the flat was not handed over in time although the Complainant was willing to pay the balance amount. This is why he has filed this case seeking direction to the OPs for transferring possession and ownership in respect to the agreed flat or in the alternative to refund Rs. 4,10,000/- with interest, compensation and cost.
  3. The OPs have filed W/V to contest the case denying the allegations incorporated in the complaint as against them. It has categorically been stated therein that the flat could be made ready for habitation within the month of February 2019. But the Complainant refused to pay the price of the increased area if 59 Square feet and this is the reason for which the talks could not be finalized.
  4. The only point which is to be decided in this case is whether the Complainant is entitled to the relief sought for.
  5. In support of her case, the Complainant has filed money receipts, copy of agreement, the copies of letters sent or received by her, evidence on affidavit and written argument. Those documents have not been challenged by the OPs in any way. The written version filed by them also does not have any grains to attack those documents.
  6. Those unchallenged documents go to show that for purchasing a flat of 610 Sq.ft. the complainant paid Rs. 4,10,000/- to the OPs under a valid agreement.
  7. The OPs have raised a claim that the area of the flat was increased from the 610 Sq.ft. to 669 Sq.ft., for which the complainant was liable to pay additional amount for 59 Sq.ft. area which was calculated at Rs. 1,08,000/-. But the said claim does not enjoy legal sanction. It is well settled that the claim for additional area of flat is not recoverable. But at the same time the balance amount of  Rs. 11,00,000/-  -  Rs. 4,10,000/-  =  Rs. 6,90,000/- still remain payable to the OPs. The complainant failed to keep his promise for payment of  Rs. 6,00,000/- to get the possession by 28th February, 2019, now he may get the possession of flat after making payment of Rs 6,90,000/-. In the result the case succeeds.
  8. The OPs are directed to deliver the possession and at the same time to execute and register a sale deed in respect to the 1st Floor flat of the building at Holding No. 212, Bandhab Nagar Colony under P.S. – Dum Dum after accepting a sum of Rs. 6,90,000/- from the complainant within 60 days hence or in the alternative to refund Rs. 4,10,000/- with interest @ 10% with effect from 14.02.2019 and compensation of  Rs. 1,00,000/- and litigation cost of Rs. 50,000/- within the period of 60 days, failing which the said amount will accrue interest @ 14% PA.

Let plain copy be given to the parties free of cost as per CPR.

 

Dictated and corrected by

[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Lakshmi Kanta Das]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Silpi Majumder]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.