Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/237/2020

Vinu Wintson Paul - Complainant(s)

Versus

Oneplus india - Opp.Party(s)

02 Nov 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/237/2020
( Date of Filing : 06 Nov 2020 )
 
1. Vinu Wintson Paul
sibees,tc 10/484,asiwarya avenue,manthala,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Oneplus india
opposite vipro park soft road,koramangala,banguluru
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 02 Nov 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 237/2020 Filed on 06/11/2020

ORDER DATED: 02/11/2022

 

Complainant

:

Vinu Winston Paul, Sibees, TC.10/484, Aiswarya Avenue, Mannanthala.P.O., Thiruvananthapuram – 695 015.

                   (Party in person)

Opposite party

:

One Plus India (Corporate Office), 5th floor, Kabra Excelsior, Opposite Wipro Park 80ft Road, Koramangala, 1st block, Bangalore – 560 025.

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party.  After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party.   The notice issued to the opposite party was returned with endorsement ‘addressee left’.  Hence the complainant was directed to take steps against the opposite party.  Inspite of giving sufficient opportunities the complainant failed to take steps against the opposite party.  As the complainant was continuously absent, notice was issued to the complainant to appear before this Commission to further proceed with this complaint.  The notice issued to the complainant was served to the complainant on 07/06/2022.  Even after accepting the notice issued from this Commission, the complainant was continuously absent and hence we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.

In the result complaint is dismissed for default.  There will be no order as to cost.       

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 02nd  day of November,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.