Haryana

Panchkula

CC/40/2020

SMT.SUMITRA DEVI. - Complainant(s)

Versus

ONB METLIFE INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

ANIRUDH KUSH & RAJESH SHARMA.

01 Jul 2022

ORDER

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PANCHKULA.

                                      

Consumer Complaint No.

:

40 of 2020

Date of Institution

:

31.01.2020

Date of Decision

:

01.07.2022

 

Smt. Sumitra Devi, Aged 64 years wife of Shri Devi Ram, resident of House No. 325-A Vishnu Dutt Colony, Power House Surajpur, Pinjore, Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula, Haryana.

 

          Versus

1.       PNB Metlife India Insurance Company Ltd., SCO No. 68-69, Sector-17-    B, Chandigarh (Through its Circle Manager).

2.       Punjab National Bank, Branch HMT, Pinjore, Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula (Through its Branch Manager).      

3.       Amit Kumar, Authorized representative of PNB MET Life India,      Insurance Company Limited, C/o Punjab National Bank, HMT Pinjore,        Tehsil Kalka, District Panchkula, Haryana.

4.       Chunky Mehta Aged Code No. 30011537, C/o PNB Metlife India    Insurance Co. Ltd., SCO No. 68-69, sector-17 B, Chandigarh.

            ….….Opposite Parties

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 1986

as amended upto date

 

Before:        Shri Satpal, President.

Dr. Pawan Kumar Saini, Member.

                   Dr. Sushma Garg, Member.

 

Present:       Ms. Anuradha Sohal, Advocate for the complainant.

None for OP No. 1.       

None for OP No. 2.

OP No. 3 already ex-parte vide order dated 18.03.2021.

OP No. 4 already ex-parte vide order dated 02.09.2021.

 

                    Today the case is fixed for filing evidence by the OPs as well as amicable Settlement. The Complainant, by making a separate statement, states that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties; so, the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint and thus onthe direction on the of the complainant, she withdraws the present complaint, being fully satisfied.

                   Heard. In view of the statement made by the Complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn, being fully satisfied.

          A copy of this order be sent to the parties, free of costs and File be consigned to record room after due compliance.

 

Dt.                     (Dr.Sushma Garg)                   (Dr. Pawan Kumar Saini)                   (Satpal)

01.07.2022                    Member                          Member                              President

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.