Chandigarh

StateCommission

CC/525/2017

Harpreet Singh Duggal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Omaxe Chandigarh Extension Developers Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Munish Goel, Adv.

24 Jan 2018

ORDER

Sh. Ashim Aggarwal, Advocate, proxy Counsel for Sh. Sanjeev Sharma, Advocate, Counsel for the Opposite Parties raised a very serious objection that as on today, the total value of the product and the relief claimed would come beyond Rs.1 crore.

                   Faced with the situation, Counsel for the complainants wishes to withdraw this complaint, at this stage, with liberty to file a-fresh complaint after giving better particulars either before this Commission or any other competent Commission/Authority.

                   To the prayer made, no objection has been raised by the Counsel opposite.

                   Liberty granted.

                   Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed as withdrawn.

                   On submitting one photocopy of complete original file, Registry will return all the three files, in original, (excluding zimini orders), to the complainant, within a week from today, against proper receipt.

                   Certified copies of the order be sent to the parties free of charge.