NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/4406/2009

HARYANA BEEJ VIKAS NIGAM LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

OM PARKASH - Opp.Party(s)

MR. VISHAL GUPTA & MANISH SRIVASTAVA

16 Mar 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 4406 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 07/08/2009 in Appeal No. 791/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. HARYANA BEEJ VIKAS NIGAM LTD.Bay No. 3-6, Sector 2,PanchkulaHaryana ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. OM PARKASHR/o Village Kusumbhi, Tehsil and Distt.Sirsa ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.N.P. SINGH ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S.K. NAIK ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 16 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

We have carefully gone through the review petition No. 49/2010 for reviewing our order dated 13.01.2010 in RP No. 4406/2009. Ground taken in the review application is that when the matter came before the Commission on 11.12.2009, though it is shown to have been adjourned to 13.01.2010, in fact the counsel for petitioner has noted the next date of hearing in the matter as 29.01.2010. The review petition was dismissed by us both for non-prosecution and also being bereft of merit. There is no error apparent on the face of the record. Hence, review application is dismissed with no order as to cost.



......................JB.N.P. SINGHPRESIDING MEMBER
......................S.K. NAIKMEMBER