Delhi

StateCommission

A/1031/2014

MRS. DOLLY BANSAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

OCTAGON BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

21 Nov 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
First Appeal No. A/1031/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 03/09/2014 in Case No. CC/719/2014 of District East Delhi)
 
1. MRS. DOLLY BANSAL
B-60, EAST OF KAILASH, N.D.-110065.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. OCTAGON BUILDER & PROMOTERS PVT. LTD. & ANR.
REGD. OFF: 78, HARGOBIND ENCLAVE, DELHI-92.
2. MR. PRADEEP AGGARWAL
REGD. OFF: 78, HARGOBIND ENCLAVE, DELHI-92.
3. MADHUBAN PROPERTY
311, SECOND FLOOR, JAIPURIA PLAZA, SEC-26, NOIDA U.P.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION :DELHI

(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)

 

                                                                                                                 Date of Decision: 21.11.2014

                                    

First Appeal – 1031/2014

 

Mrs. Dolly Bansal,

B-60, East of Kailash,

New Delhi-110065.

Through S.P.A.

Shri Anil Sharma

 

………Appellant

Vs

  1. Octagon Builder & Promoters (P) Ltd.,

Regd. Off: 78, Hargobind Enclave,

Delhi-110092.

 

Also at:

 

D-3&4, Sector-10,

Noida-201301 (U.P.)

 

Also at:

 

H-99, Sector-63,

Noida-201309 (U.P.)

 

Also at:

 

H-218, Sector-63,

Noida.

 

  1. Mr. Pradeep Aggarwal,

Executive Director,

Octagon Builders & Promoters (P) Ltd.,

Regd. Off: 78, Hargobind Enclave,

Delhi-110092.

 

Also at:

 

D-3&4, Sector-10,

Noida-201301 (U.P.)

 

Also at:

 

H-218, Sector-63,

Noida.

 

  1. Madhuban Property,

311, Second Floor,

Jaipuria Plaza,

Sector-26,

Noida (U.P.)

……..Respondents

 

 

CORAM

 

Justice Veena Birbal, President

Salma Noor, Member

 

 

1.   Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment? 

2.   To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

 

Justice Veena Birbal, President

 

  1. 1.     Appellant herein was a complainant before the District Forum who had filed a complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 claiming the following reliefs:

 

  1. Refund the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- paid by the complainant towards booking of two flats and Rs.1,91,520/- paid towards first instalment of the two flats along with up to date interest on the said amounts at 24% per annum.

2.Pay pendent lite and future interest till the payment is made to the complainant by the opposite parties.

3. Pay Rs. 2,00,000/- as compensation for the damages and harassment caused to the complainant.

4. Any other direction that this Hon’ble court may deem fit.

2.      Ld. Counsel for the appellant has submitted that the District Forum has dismissed the complaint without hearing the appellant/complainant by a non-speaking order.  The Counsel for the appellant submits that if an opportunity of hearing is given, the appellant will satisfy the Ld. District Forum about having jurisdiction to hear the complaint of the appellant/complainant.

3.      The impugned order reads as under:

        “None present to press this complaint nor the    complainant has clarified regarding jurisdiction of this forum as to the maintainability of this complaint before it.  Let the complaint be returned to the complainant for presentation to the proper form having jurisdiction to adjudicate the issue raised in the complaint.”

  1. 4.     The aforesaid order is a non-speaking order.  No reasoning is given as to why the complaint is not maintainable before the District Forum (East).  Further no opportunity of hearing has been given to the complainant.  Considering the submissions made, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded back to the Ld. District Forum where the appellant/complainant shall appear on 7.1.15 and District Forum after considering the submissions made shall pass a fresh order.
  2. 5.     A copy of this order be sent to District Forum (East), Saini Enclave, Delhi for compliance.

 

 

                          

                                     

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.