2.6.2016
For the Applicant/D.H None
For the respondent/J.D Sh. R.R. Arora Advocate
Ld. counsel for the Judgment Debtor/ respondent contended that initially the complaint filed by Amandeep Kaur was allowed by the District Forum and appeal filed against said order was also dismissed by the Hon’ble State Commission, Punjab, Chandigarh and thereafter Judgment Debtor/ respondent filed Review Petition in the Hon’ble National Commission, New Delhi. He contended that though the Hon’ble National Commission observed the order in favour of the Judgment Debtor / respondent but due to clerical mistake, it was mentioned that revision petition has been dismissed and thereupon Review Petition was filed, which was allowed vide order dated 21.1.2016 by the Hon’ble National Commission, New Delhi and was ordered that Revision Petition is allowed and impugned order is set aside and complaint is dismissed and as such, execution cannot proceed further.
Case called several times since morning but none has appeared on behalf of decree holder/ complainant. It is 2.25 P.M. Let case be again called after some time.
(Jaswinder Kaur) (A.K. Mehta)
Member President
E.A. No. 1/2016 Amandeep Kaur Vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
2.6.2016
For the Applicant/D.H None
For the respondent/J.D Sh. R.R. Arora Advocate
Case called several times after 2.25 p.m. None appeared for the applicant/ decree holder. It is now 3.15 p.m. case called again, none appeared for the applicant/ decree holder. Consequently, the execution is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Copy of order be supplied to the parties free of costs. File be consigned to record room.
Pronounced in open Forum
Dt. 2.6.2016
(Jaswinder Kaur) (A.K. Mehta)
Member President
