Kerala

Palakkad

CC/52/2018

M.N. Govind - Complainant(s)

Versus

O.G. vinod - Opp.Party(s)

27 Apr 2018

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD
Near District Panchayath Office, Palakkad - 678 001, Kerala
 
Complaint Case No. CC/52/2018
( Date of Filing : 07 Apr 2018 )
 
1. M.N. Govind
Secretary, Devasrayam Charitable Society, Thekkethara, Marutharoad, Palakkad - 678 007
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. O.G. vinod
M/s. UNIQ Enterprises, Visaal Buildings, Near Bagavathy Temple, Pudusserry (PO), Palakkad- 678 623
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiny.P.R. PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. V.P.Anantha Narayanan MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 27 Apr 2018
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PALAKKAD

Dated this the 27th  day of  April 2018 

Present  : Smt.Shiny.P.R,  President

             : Sri. V.P.Anantha Narayanan, Member         Date of Filing : 07/04/2018

 

      CC/52/2018

 

Devasrayam Charitable Society,                                         :        Complainant   

Thekkethara,

Marutharoad,

Palakkad – 678 007.

Rep.by Secretary M.N.Govind.

(By Adv.K.K.Jaidip)

 

  Vs

O.G.Vinod,

M/s Uniq Enterprises,

Visual Buildings,

Near Bagavathy Temple,

Pudussery (PO),

Palakkad – 678 623.                                                           :          Opposite party

 

                                                      O R D E R

 

By Smt.Shiny.P.R, President

 

Case of the complainant is that they have purchased steam cooking unit on 9-6-2015 from the opposite party for an amount of Rs 5,98,835/-. Allegation of the complainant is that opposite party supplied products of substandard quality and the rice cooking vessel is made up of low quality wire gauge. Within 3 months of installation the cowl was damaged. Even after repeated requests there was no response from the opposite party. Believing the advertisement and brochures complainant opted to purchase the product of the opposite party. Hence the complainant filed complaint for getting compensation from the opposite party for the deficiency in service and unfair trade practice committed by them. 

 

Heard on admission. As per the order in IA 110/2018 filed for condoning the delay of 366 days we are of the view that complaint is not maintainable before the Forum. Consequently, the complaint is dismissed without going to the merits of the case.

 

 

 

          Pronounced in the open court on this the 27th day of April 2018.

 

                                                                                      Sd/-                                                                                                        Shiny.P.R                                                                                

                       President

                          
                                     Sd/-

          V.P.Anantha Narayanan

                        Member

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiny.P.R.]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.P.Anantha Narayanan]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.