Circuit Bench Nagpur

StateCommission

A/08/633

BHARTIYA GYANPEETH - Complainant(s)

Versus

NUTAN RAHANGDALE - Opp.Party(s)

ADV.ANKAR

19 Jul 2011

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR
5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1
CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001
 
First Appeal No. A/08/633
(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/07/2008 in Case No. CC/08/29 of District )
 
1. BHARTIYA GYANPEETH
GONDIA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. NUTAN RAHANGDALE
GONDIA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  HON'BLE P.N.KASHALKAR PRESIDING MEMBER
  HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
None
......for the Appellant
 
Adv.Kane
......for the Respondent
ORDER

PER SHRI P.N. KASHALKAR, HON'BLE JUDICIAL MEMBER

None is present for the appellant. Respondent is represented by

 

Adv.Gupte. We have perused the impugned judgment, affidavit and pleadings of

 

he parties. We are finding that the daughter of the Respondent was admitted for

 

nursery class conducted by appellant Bharatiya Dnyanpith at Gondia. The total

 

annual fee of the school was Rs.3100/- which was to be deposited in 3

 

installments. Accordingly, Respondent/complainant paid Rs.1100/- on 3/8/07,

 

Rs.1000/- on 27/10/07, however, he did not pay the third installment within the

 

stipulated period. Hence the school authorities asked his daughter to stand

 

outside and her admission was cancelled. Hence the consumer complaint was

 

filed claiming refund of fee deposited besides Rs.90,000/- towards compensation

 

and Rs.3000/- as cost.

 

The opponent filed written statement and contended that if the

 

complainant would have deposited the third installment within the stipulated

 

period, the dispute would not have arisen. They had intimated the child and her

 

father again and again and also by telephone that they should pay the last

 

installment of fees but the same was not paid. School has pleaded that they are

 

not guilty of deficiency of service and as such the complaint should be dismissed.

 

The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum after considering the

 

pleadings and documents placed before it, was of the opinion that the school

 

subjected the child to unnecessary harassment and she was required to stand

 

outside the class. A nominal compensation of Rs.2000/- for physical and mental

 

harassment and cost of Rs.500/- was awarded to the complainant. Aggrieved by

 

the same, the school authorities have filed this appeal.

 

Appellant is absent. We heard Adv.Gupte for the Respondent. We are finding that the order passed by the District Forum is just and proper. The school should not have

 

resorted to such a drastic action by asking the pupil to stand outside the class

 

days together. It must have caused mental trauma in the mind of the said child.

 

Children of tender age attending nursery class should not be required to undergo

 

such punishment for the default committed by his/her parents. We are finding

 

that the order of the District Forum asking the appellant to pay a compensation of

 

Rs.2000/- for physical and mental harassment and cost of Rs.500/- to the

 

complainant is just and proper and there is no merit in the appeal preferred by

 

the school administration.

 

Hence the order…

 

1) Appeal is dismissed.

 

2) No order as to cost.

 

3) Inform the parties accordingly.

 

Delivered on 19/07/2011.

 

 
 
[ HON'BLE P.N.KASHALKAR]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[ HON'BLE MR.N. ARUMUGAM]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.