Nokia India V/S Kulwant Singh - Consumer Court Case

Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/10/20

Kulwant Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nokia India - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Navjot Singh Roamana Advocate

25 Mar 2010

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/20

Kulwant Singh Neuron Tecnologies						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Nokia India						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for the opposite party No.1.W.O. Stated that opposite party No.1 is ready replace the mobile set No.5530 instead of N-73 or refund the payment of Rs. 13,150/- (Rupees Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Fifty Only) for mobile set in question which was purchased on 13.8.08 within 30 days from today against original mobile set in question . RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 25.03.10. Statement of Sh.Navjot Singh,counsel for the complainant W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.1 as stated by Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for opposite party No.1. In view of the statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal, I may kindly be allowed to withdraw the complaint as fully satisfied. I shall handover the original mobile hand set in question to opposite party No.1 through their counsel at same time. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 25.03.10 25.03.10: Present: Sh. Navjot Singh,counsel for the complainant Sh.Sukhdev Milttal,counsel for opposite party No.1. Opposite party No.2 already exparte. Counsel for the opposite party No.1 and complainant have made the above statements, they are bound by their statements. In view of statements of the counsel for the complainant and learned counsel for the opposite party No.1, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn as fully satisfied. The opposite party No.1 is directed to replace the mobile set No.5530 instead of N-73 or refund the payment of Rs. 13,150/- (Rupees Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Fifty Only) in the shape of cheque on or before 25.4.10 and complainant is directed to handover the original mobile hand set in question to opposite party No.1 through their counsel at the same time. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.

Statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for the opposite party No.1.W.O. Stated that opposite party No.1 is ready replace the mobile set No.5530 instead of N-73 or refund the payment of Rs. 13,150/- (Rupees Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Fifty Only) for mobile set in question which was purchased on 13.8.08 within 30 days from today against original mobile set in question . RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 25.03.10. Statement of Sh.Navjot Singh,counsel for the complainant W.O. Stated that I accept the offer of opposite party No.1 as stated by Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,counsel for opposite party No.1. In view of the statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal, I may kindly be allowed to withdraw the complaint as fully satisfied. I shall handover the original mobile hand set in question to opposite party No.1 through their counsel at same time. RO&AC Member Member President, D.C.F. 25.03.10 25.03.10: Present: Sh. Navjot Singh,counsel for the complainant Sh.Sukhdev Milttal,counsel for opposite party No.1. Opposite party No.2 already exparte. Counsel for the opposite party No.1 and complainant have made the above statements, they are bound by their statements. In view of statements of the counsel for the complainant and learned counsel for the opposite party No.1, this complaint is dismissed as withdrawn as fully satisfied. The opposite party No.1 is directed to replace the mobile set No.5530 instead of N-73 or refund the payment of Rs. 13,150/- (Rupees Thirteen Thousand One Hundred and Fifty Only) in the shape of cheque on or before 25.4.10 and complainant is directed to handover the original mobile hand set in question to opposite party No.1 through their counsel at the same time. File be consigned. Member Member President, D.C.F.