Chandigarh

DF-I

CC/753/2010

Anthony Raj - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

21 Jan 2011

ORDER


CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019
CONSUMER CASE NO. 753 of 2010
1. Anthony RajSon Sh. Yuda Thadeus R/o HOuse No. 658 Phase-2 Ramdarbar Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)

Vs.
1. Nokia India Pvt. Ltd.The Care Manager SP Infocity Indl. Plot 243 Udyog Vihar Phase-1 Deundabera,Gurgaon-122016 Haryana2. Nokia Care SCO 2433-342nd Floor SEctor-22/C Chandigarh3. M/s Nokia Dealer Three Vee Mktg.(P)Ltd. SCO 1028-1029 Sector-22/B, Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s)


For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 21 Jan 2011
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT HELD IN DISTRICT FORUM-I, U.T.

CHANDIGARH

           

                                                Consumer Complaint No.  753 of 2010

 

Anthony Raj #658, Phase 2 Ramdarbar,Chandigarh 160002.

 

                                                                                                              - Complainant

                                                Versus

 

1.         Nokia India Pvt. Ltd. The Care Manager Nokia India Pvt. Ltd., Sp Infocity, Indl.Plot#243, Udyog Vihar Phase I, Dundahera Gurgaon-122016, Haryana.

2.         Nokia Care, SCO 2433-34, 2nd Floor, Sector 22-C, Chandigarh.

3.         Nokia Dealer Three Vee Marketing (P) Ltd. SCO 1028-1029, Sector 22-B, Chandigarh.

-          Opposite Parties

 

Present:           Complainant in person.

                        Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate for OP No.2.

                        None for OP No.1 & 3.

 

Dated, the 21st day of January, 2011.

                                                            ORDER

1.                     This case has been taken up today in the Lok Adalat. Efforts were made to settle the matter, which stood fructified and the parties have settled the dispute. Statement given by them is reproduced as under:-            

            “Statement of Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate for OP No.2.

 

The matter has been settled between the parties. As per settlement, the OP No.2 will refund the invoice amount of Rs.13,500/- to the complainant within  a week from today i.e. 21.1.2011.

 

Statement of Sh.Anthony Raj son of Shri Yuda Thadeus, Complainant in person.

 

I accept the above statement given by Sh.Gaurav Bhardwaj, Advocate for OP No.2. I will handover the old mobile handset in question with accessories to OP No.2 at the time of receiving the invoice amount of Rs.13,500/-.”

 

 

2.                     Keeping in view the above statements, the complaint stands disposed of. However, OP No.2 would refund the invoice amount of Rs.13,500/- to the complainant within a week from today i.e. 21.1.2011. The complainant would handover the old mobile handset in question with accessories to OP No.2 at the time of receiving the invoice amount of Rs.13,500/-.

3.                     Copies of this order free of cost be supplied to the parties. The file be consigned.                                      

 

                                                                                                PRESIDING MEMBER                                                                                  LOK ADALAT

 

 

                        2nd MEMBER                                   1st MEMBER



DR. MRS MADANJIT KAUR SAHOTA, MEMBER MR. RAJINDER SINGH GILL, PRESIDING MEMBER ,