Nokia India Pvt Ltd. V/S Karamjit Singh - Consumer Court Case

Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/08/275

Karamjit Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nokia India Pvt Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Varun Gupta Advocate

20 Feb 2009

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/275

Karamjit Singh						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Nokia India Pvt Ltd. M/S Prem Electronics Emporium Neuron Techonlogies						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh.Varun Gupta,Advocate,counsel for the complainant W.O. The offer given by opposite party No.1 to replace the mobile handset with new handset with new handset model No.N-73-M within four weeks is acceptable to the complainant. In view of this offer, complainant does not want to proceed with this complaint and it may be dismissed as withdrawn. RO&AC Member Member, D.C.F. Statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate,counsel for opposite party No.1 W.O. I have received old mobile handset having IMEI No.356406019234227,make Nokia,from the complainant today. Opposite party No.1 would deliver a new handset make Nokia model N-73M to the complainant within four weeks from today. RO&AC Member Member, D.C.F. 20.2.09 Present: Sh.Varun Gupta,Advocate,counsel for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate, counsel for opposite party No.1. Sh.G.S.Bhasin,Advocate,counsel for opposite party No.3. Opposite party No.2 already exparte. Learned counsel for the complainant and opposite party No.1 have made the above statements. In view of these statements, complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Opposite party No.1 would deliver a new mobile handset make Nokia,model N-73M to the complainant within four weeks from today i.e.upto 20.3.2009. Opposite party No.1 shall also provide standard limited warranty for 12 months on the new handset. Parties are left to bear their own costs. File be consigned. Member Member, D.C.F.

Statement of Sh.Varun Gupta,Advocate,counsel for the complainant W.O. The offer given by opposite party No.1 to replace the mobile handset with new handset with new handset model No.N-73-M within four weeks is acceptable to the complainant. In view of this offer, complainant does not want to proceed with this complaint and it may be dismissed as withdrawn. RO&AC Member Member, D.C.F. Statement of Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate,counsel for opposite party No.1 W.O. I have received old mobile handset having IMEI No.356406019234227,make Nokia,from the complainant today. Opposite party No.1 would deliver a new handset make Nokia model N-73M to the complainant within four weeks from today. RO&AC Member Member, D.C.F. 20.2.09 Present: Sh.Varun Gupta,Advocate,counsel for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate, counsel for opposite party No.1. Sh.G.S.Bhasin,Advocate,counsel for opposite party No.3. Opposite party No.2 already exparte. Learned counsel for the complainant and opposite party No.1 have made the above statements. In view of these statements, complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. Opposite party No.1 would deliver a new mobile handset make Nokia,model N-73M to the complainant within four weeks from today i.e.upto 20.3.2009. Opposite party No.1 shall also provide standard limited warranty for 12 months on the new handset. Parties are left to bear their own costs. File be consigned. Member Member, D.C.F.