Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/08/218

Ravi Kant Narula - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nokia India Private Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Sanjay Goyal Advocate

20 Dec 2008

ORDER


District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/218

Ravi Kant Narula
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

Nokia India Private Ltd.
Sunil Mobile Empire
Hindtel Communication
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:


Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

Statement of Sh.Mukesh Kumar,Prop. of opposite party No.3 on oath. I offer mobile handset in question duly repaired and in working condition with extended validity for six months from today to the complainant. I also offer Rs.2,000/- to the complainant towards costs and compenstation in full and final settlement of the claim. RO&AC Member Member Presiding Member, D.C.F. Statement of Sh.Ravi Kant Narula,complainant on oath. I have heard the statement of Sh.Mukesh Kumar. It is acceptable to me. I have received Rs.2,000/- in cash towards costs and compensation. I hazve also received by mobile handset duly repaired. In these circumstances, I do not want to proceed with my complaint and it may be dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied. RO&AC Member Member Presiding Member, D.C.F. 20.12.08 Present: Complainant in person with his counsel Sh.Sanjay Goyal. Sh.Sukhdesv Mittal,counsel for the opposite party No.1. Sh.Satish Kumar,Prop. of opposite party No.2. Sh.Mukesh Kumar,Prop.of opposite party No.3 in person. Case taken up in Mega Lok Adalat. Complainant and Sh.Mukesh Kumar, Proprietor of opposite party No.3 have made statements. They will be bound by them. In view of the statement made by the complainant, and compromise effected by the parties, complainant is dismissed as withdrawn being fully satisfied. File be consigned. Member Member Presiding Member, D.C.F.