Nokia India Ltd V/S Tara Singh - Consumer Court Case

Punjab

Bhatinda

CC/09/31

Tara Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nokia India Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. R.S. Cheema Advocate

27 Mar 2009

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Bathinda (Punjab)
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Govt. House No. 16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence, Bathinda-151 001
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/31

Tara Singh						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Nokia India Ltd Bhushan General Store Neuron Technologies,						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

27.3.09 Present: None for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate, counsel for opposite party No.1. Opposite parties No.2&3 already exparte. Case has been taken up. No-one is present on behalf of the complainant. It is now 11.25 A.M. Be awaited. Member Member, D.C.F. 27.3.09 Present None for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate, counsel for the opposite party No.1. Opposite party No.2&3 already exparte. Case has again been taken up. Neither the complainant nor his counsel is present. It is now 12.50 P.M. Be awaited and put up after lunch break. Member Member, 27.3.09 Present None for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate, counsel for the opposite party No.1. Opposite party No.2&3 already exparte. Case has again been taken up and called repeatedly. Neither the complainant nor his counsel is present. It is now 4.30 P.M. In these circumstance, it appeared that complainant is not interested to pursue his case. Accordingly, complaint is dismissed under section 13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 for want of appearance of the complainant before this Forum. File be consigned. Member Member, D.C.F.

27.3.09 Present: None for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate, counsel for opposite party No.1. Opposite parties No.2&3 already exparte. Case has been taken up. No-one is present on behalf of the complainant. It is now 11.25 A.M. Be awaited. Member Member, D.C.F. 27.3.09 Present None for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate, counsel for the opposite party No.1. Opposite party No.2&3 already exparte. Case has again been taken up. Neither the complainant nor his counsel is present. It is now 12.50 P.M. Be awaited and put up after lunch break. Member Member, 27.3.09 Present None for the complainant. Sh.Sukhdev Mittal,Advocate, counsel for the opposite party No.1. Opposite party No.2&3 already exparte. Case has again been taken up and called repeatedly. Neither the complainant nor his counsel is present. It is now 4.30 P.M. In these circumstance, it appeared that complainant is not interested to pursue his case. Accordingly, complaint is dismissed under section 13(2)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act,1986 for want of appearance of the complainant before this Forum. File be consigned. Member Member, D.C.F.