Haryana

Karnal

CC/6/2016

Narender Kumar S/o Rajbir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Nokia Consumer Service - Opp.Party(s)

Rajesh Mani

18 Mar 2016

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. 

                                                                        Complaint No.06of 2016

                                                               Date of instt.: 4.01.2016

                                                                        Date of decision: 18.3.2016

 

 Narender Kumar son of Sh.Rajbir Singh resident of house no.2934, Gali No.1, Shiv Colony, Karnal tehsil and District Karnal.

                                                                         ……..Complainant.

                                    Vs.

1.Nokia Consumer Service through its Manager, registered office at 6^th Floor, Tower-B, Building No.10 DLF Cyber City, Phase-II, Gurgaon 122002(Haryana)

2.Flipkart India Pvt.Ltd.office at National Highway 8, Mahipalpur village Mahipalpur, New Delhi through its Manager.

3.New Mass Communication, SCO no.152, Ist Floor, Mugal Canal Market, Karnal 132001 through its Manager.

4.W.S.Retail Services Pvt.Ltd.Khasra No.436, Road No.4m Lal /Dora Extension, Mahipalpur, New Delhi ,India through its Manager.

                                                                         ………… Opposite Parties.

                          Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer

                          Protection Act.

Before              Sh.K.C.Sharma……….President.

                        Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:-         Sh.Narender Kumar complainant with Sh.Rajesh Mani, Advocate

                        Sh.Sachin Kumar, Engineer for Opposite Parties No.1,3 and 4.

                        Sh.Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for the Opposite Party no.2.

 ORDER:

 

                    The complaint be registered.

 2.               Sh.Sachin Kumar Engineer of Opposite Parties No.1,3 and 4 made statement that Opposite Parties are ready to replace the mobile phone of the complainant with a new one within a period of twenty days from the date of deposit of old mobile phone with the Opposite parties by the complaint. Thereafter, the complainant made statement for withdrawal of the complaint by submitting that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint. Their statements have been recorded separately.

3.                     In view of the statement made by the complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn However, parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
dated:18.03.2016.

                                                                    (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                               President,

                                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Forum, Karnal.

            (Anil Sharma ) 

               Member.